From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jamie@shareable.org, pavel@ucw.cz, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
duaneg@dghda.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: force reval on dentry of bind mounted files on FS_REVAL_DOT filesystems
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:11:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1tyw8nwgk.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1NG9OV-0002g5-3D@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu> (Miklos Szeredi's message of "Thu\, 03 Dec 2009 11\:58\:43 +0100")
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> writes:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> In the case of a bind mounted file, the path walking code will assume
>> that the cached dentry that was bind mounted is valid. This is a problem
>> problem for NFSv4 in a way that's similar to LAST_BIND symlinks.
>>
>> Fix this by revalidating the dentry if FS_FOLLOW_DOT is set and
>> __follow_mount returns true.
>>
>> Note that in the non-open codepath, we cannot return an error to the
>> lookup if the revalidation fails. Doing so will leave a bind mount in
>> a state such that we can't unmount it. In that case we'll just have to
>> settle for d_invalidating it (which should mostly turn out to be a
>> d_drop in this case) and returning success.
>
> The only worry I have is that this adds an extra branch in a very hot
> codepath (do_lookup). An error can't be returned, as you note, and
> for bind mounted directories d_invalidate() will not succeed: the
> directory is busy, it's referenced by the mount.
Not true. d_mountpoint is false, so d_invalidate can succeed.
> So basically the
> only thing this does is working around the NFSv4 issue.
No, this should catch other cases where we have a dentry goes
stale as well, and lets the distributed filesystem handle it.
It is probably worth a benchmark to ease the concerns about the hotpath.
I expect the cpu will predict the branch as unlikely and we won't see
any difference.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-02 19:59 [PATCH 0/2] vfs: plug some holes involving LAST_BIND symlinks and file bind mounts (try #6) Jeff Layton
2009-12-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: force reval of target when following LAST_BIND symlinks Jeff Layton
2009-12-02 23:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 10:39 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-12-02 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: force reval on dentry of bind mounted files on FS_REVAL_DOT filesystems Jeff Layton
2009-12-03 0:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 1:23 ` Jeff Layton
2009-12-03 10:58 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-12-03 11:11 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-12-03 11:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-12-03 11:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 15:21 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-12-03 15:20 ` Jeff Layton
2009-12-03 18:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-12-03 19:15 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1tyw8nwgk.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=duaneg@dghda.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox