From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Leo Chen <leochen@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] sysctl arm: Remove binary sysctl support
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:27:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1tyx49y44.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091108164855.595ec70d@infradead.org> (Arjan van de Ven's message of "Sun\, 8 Nov 2009 16\:48\:55 -0800")
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:05:05 -0800
> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
>> >
>> > The practical difference is that /proc support now must be compiled
>> > in to support sys_sysctl.
>>
>> But thanks for the reminder that I need to go into glibc and fix this
>> before we disable the sys_sysctl emulation by default.
>
> how are you dealing with existing glibcs ? Or with static linked
> binaries? or.. or ..
>
> breaking a heavily used ABI like this is not going to be pretty
> or even sane, no matter which way you hate the current one.
sysctl_binary.c has all of the code to continue to provide the
existing ABI.
sys_sysctl is not heavily used at all, and this is the responsible
removal of a practically unused ABI. Last I check (and this was
before I shouted to the world that sys_sysctl is going away) I could
count on one hand all of the users of sys_sysctl.
/proc/sys will definitely continue to exist.
I just took a look and the use in linux threads that I don't warn
about is used by glibc-2.8 but not by glibc-2.10. glibc-2.11 has just
been released. so by next year when the removal is scheduled we are
looking at multiple releases of glibc that don't use sys_sysctl. So I
expect shortly I can warn about all uses of sys_sysctl without anyone
seeing a warning.
The one unfixed case I know about is fixing ioperm on arm, in the glibc
ports tree, and that will need to happen before sys_sysctl is disabled
by default. Which is all I intend to do when we reach that point in
feature removal schedule now that I have refactored the code so that
sys_sysctl no longer imposes a maintenance burden on the sane sysctl
users.
I don't hate sysctl, in fact for global tuneables I would argue for
all it's faults sysctl it is one of the better interfaces we have. I
just figure the implementation needs to be optimized for the way
sysctl is used today, the via /proc/sys.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 3:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-08 12:16 [PATCH 00/23] Removal of binary sysctl support Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 01/23] sysctl: Remove the unused frv sysctl unumbers Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 02/23] sysctl: Stop using binary sysctl numbers in arlan Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-11 21:07 ` John W. Linville
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 03/23] sysctl: Reduce sys_sysctl to a compatibility wrapper around /proc/sys Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 04/23] sysctl: Neuter the generic sysctl strategy routines Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 05/23] sysctl: Remove dead code from sysctl_check Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 06/23] sysctl: Remove references to ctl_name and strategy from the generic sysctl table Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 07/23] sysctl: Don't look at ctl_name and strategy in the generic code Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 08/23] sysctl ipc: Remove dead binary sysctl support code Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 09/23] sysctl net: Remove unused binary sysctl code Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 10/23] sysctl fs: Remove dead binary sysctl support Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 11/23] sysctl kernel: Remove binary sysctl logic Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:21 ` [PATCH 12/23] sysctl security/keys: Remove dead binary sysctl support Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 13/23] sysctl crypto: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 15:44 ` Herbert Xu
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 14/23] sysctl drivers: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 8:17 ` Clemens Ladisch
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 15/23] sysctl mips/lasat: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 14:10 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 16/23] sysctl frv: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 17/23] sysctl s390: Remove dead sysctl binary support Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 18/23] sysctl ia64: Remove dead binary sysctl support Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 19/23] sysctl powerpc: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 20:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 20/23] sysctl sh: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 21/23] sysctl x86: " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 22/23] sysctl arm: Remove " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:34 ` Russell King
2009-11-08 22:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 22:56 ` Russell King
2009-11-08 23:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 23:34 ` Russell King
2009-11-08 23:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 0:48 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-09 3:27 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-11-09 4:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-09 5:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 9:38 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-09 11:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 12:04 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-09 12:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 13:28 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-09 15:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-09 15:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-09 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-10 4:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-10 8:01 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-11 2:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-09 12:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 12:22 ` [PATCH 23/23] sysctl: Remove the last of the generic " Eric W. Biederman
2009-11-08 13:06 ` [PATCH 00/23] Removal of " Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-09 3:44 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1tyx49y44.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=leochen@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox