From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:05:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1veed82mz.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <465A6197.5010402@yahoo.com.au> (Nick Piggin's message of "Mon, 28 May 2007 14:59:03 +1000")
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> writes:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>>> When we initialize the ramdisk by writing to /dev/ram0 usually in
>>> init/do_mounts_rd.c we don't allocate buffer heads but we do set
>>> the dirty bit, and the page is in the page cache. So when we
>>> later call getblk it reuses the same page and then calls
>>> init_page_buffers.
>>
>>
>> Hmm, so this would be a problem for block_dev.c as well, then?
>> Because it would be possible to have a dirty block dev page
>> have its buffers reclaimed and then reinitialised via
>> init_page_buffers, AFAIKS.
>
> Oh, no, try_to_free_buffers won't drop dirty buffers. However we
> could still set_page_dirty of a block device page without buffers
> via an mmap.
After the page is made dirty via mmap we have:
sys_write -> ... -> block_prepare_write -> ... -> create_empty_buffers.
I suspect that is a pretty rare case but it does indeed seem to exist
as a problem.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-28 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 2:31 [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-22 2:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] rd: Mark ramdisk buffer heads dirty in ramdisk_set_page_dirty Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-22 2:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] rd: Simplify by using the same helper functions in libfs Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-28 4:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers Nick Piggin
2007-05-28 4:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-28 4:54 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-28 4:59 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-28 14:05 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-05-29 5:14 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-29 5:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 11:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 15:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-31 16:40 ` [PATCH] rd: Remove ramdisk_set_page_dirty Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 16:43 ` [PATCH] buffer: Kill old incorrect? comment Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-28 13:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] Preserve the dirty bit in init_page_buffers Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-28 6:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-05-28 13:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1veed82mz.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox