Re: [PATCH 0/9] namespaces: Introduction

[ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)]

"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> writes:

>
> Here are the numbers with the basic patchsets.  But I guess I should
> do another round with adding 7 more void*'s to represent additional
> namespaces.

I'm a little slow coming up to speed on these benchmarks.
dbench and tbench are measured in megabytes per second correct?
kernbench is the number of seconds it takes to compile a kernel?
reaim is measured in jobs per minute?

So if I read this right the differences are currently in
the noise levels, from your testing.

> (intervals are for 95% CI, tests were each run 15 times)
>
>            |  with nsproxy  |   without nsproxy |
> kernbench  | 68.90 +/- 0.21 |   69.06 +/- 0.22  |
> dbench     | 386.0 +/- 26.6 |   388.4 +/- 21.0  |
> tbench     | 391.6 +/- 8.00 |   389.4 +/- 10.95 |
>
> reaim with nsproxy
> 1 115600.000000 5512.441557
> 3 246985.712000 9375.780582
> 5 272309.092000 8029.833742
> 7 290020.000000 7288.367116
> 9 298591.580000 5557.531915
> 11 nan nan
> 13 nan nan
> 15 nan nan
>
> reaim without nsproxy
> 1 110160.000000 5728.697311
> 3 246985.712000 9375.780582
> 5 262204.197333 11138.510652
> 7 288660.000000 6880.898412
> 9 300631.580000 4351.926692
> 11 nan nan
> 13 nan nan
> 15 nan nan