Re: [Patch] kexec: increase max of kexec segments and use dynamic allocation

Cong Wang
2010-07-27T08:10:46Z

On 07/26/10 20:19, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Cong Wang<amwang@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> So, what is a better number? 2048? :)
>
> I was thinking something a little ridiculous like 10K or 64K.
>
> Assuming the usage you care about is something like hibernate on a
> machine with disjoint memory where you truly need one segment for
> each memory region.
>
> The only point of a limit at all once we introduce dynamic allocation
> is to catch buggy apps.
>

Ok, I will change that number and improve the changelog.

Thanks.

--
The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference.
- Elie Wiesel