From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization.
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:17:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1y6w4u001.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49991D8C.1050705@jp.fujitsu.com> (Kenji Kaneshige's message of "Mon\, 16 Feb 2009 17\:02\:20 +0900")
Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>>
>>> And on the big gotcha's I have found one more I am tracking.
>>>
>>> I am seeing pci bridges with a NULL pointer for the subordinate bus.
>>> Earlier I had thought that this was a symptom of the double remove
>>> but I have been able to reproduce it without that.
>>>
>>> On just a little bit deeper investigation it looks like the cases
>>> are dying are all coming when the nested bridge reappears.
>>>
>>> Which is wrong on so many levels as I am toggle power to the outer
>>> slot, so the nested bridge should not even exist at that time. Ugh.
>>> More tracing to for me on that one.
>>
>> Ok. Got it. I was processing the interrupt for a device after it had
>> been hot removed but before the device state had disappeared.
>>
>> pcie_isr looks like it would be even worse in that situation. Looping forever
>> if pciehp_readw(ctrl, PCIE_EXPSLTA) always succeed sand returns 0xffff.
>>
>> That loop in there appears impossibly misguided. If the pending interrupt
>> values change after you have received the interrupt another instance
>> of the same interrupt should be pending so the loop should be completely
>> unnecessary.
>>
>
> For level-triggered interrupt, I think it's true.
>
> But for edge-triggered interrupt, I don't think it's true. I think
> only one interrupt is generated if the first hotplug event occurs
> and the second hotplug event occurs before clearing the status of
> first hotplug event.
My test case is edge-triggered MSI's. The issue is that I get an interrupt
from the card that I am unplugging, but by the time the interrupt handler
is executed the card is physically absent, but the pci_dev structure is
still present in the kernel.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 23:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 3:31 [PATCH] pciehp: Handle interrupts that happen during initialization Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-29 7:34 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-13 19:29 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-14 4:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-14 12:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-14 14:56 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-16 8:02 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-17 23:17 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2009-02-18 5:48 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-23 11:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 17:05 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-24 17:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-02-16 8:00 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-18 0:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-18 7:12 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-18 8:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-20 6:18 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-23 11:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-02-24 17:38 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1y6w4u001.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox