public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: qianli zhao <zhaoqianligood@gmail.com>,
	christian@brauner.io, axboe@kernel.dk,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qianli Zhao <zhaoqianli@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exit: trigger panic when init process is set to SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 16:13:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1zgzamzd9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210310173236.GB8973@redhat.com> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2021 18:32:37 +0100")

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:

> On 03/10, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> 	/* If global init has exited,
>>          * panic immediately to get a useable coredump.
>>          */
>> 	if (unlikely(is_global_init(tsk) &&
>> 	    (thread_group_empty(tsk) ||
>>             (tsk->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)))) {
>> 		panic("Attempted to kill init!	exitcode=0x%08x\n",
>>                 	tsk->signal->group_exit_code ?: (int)code);
>> 	}
>>
>> The thread_group_empty test is needed to handle single threaded
>> inits.
>
> But we can't rely on thread_group_empty(). Just suppose that the main
> thread exit first, then the 2nd (last) thread exits too.

It took me a minute.  I think you are pointing out that there is a case
where we do not set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT and that init actually exits.

The case where all of the threads do pthread_exit() aka do_exit().

I think that implies that to have a comprehensive test would
need to do:

	group_dead = atomic_dec_and_test(&tsk->signal->live);

	/* If global init has exited,
	 * panic immediately to get a useable coredump.
	*/
	if (unlikely(is_global_init(tsk) &&
	    (group_dead || thread_group_empty(tsk) ||
             (tsk->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT)))) {
		panic("Attempted to kill init!	exitcode=0x%08x\n",
		tsk->signal->group_exit_code ?: (int)code);
	}

Leaving the test where it is.  Yes.  I think that should work.


Eric


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-10 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-09 13:31 [PATCH] exit: trigger panic when init process is set to SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT Qianli Zhao
2021-03-09 18:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-10  3:59   ` qianli zhao
2021-03-10 16:44     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-03-10 17:32       ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-03-10 19:07         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-03-10 22:13         ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-03-11  4:40       ` qianli zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1zgzamzd9.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zhaoqianli@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=zhaoqianligood@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox