From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>,
Luis Gerhorst <luis.gerhorst@fau.de>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kernel-patches-bot@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf, arm64: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2026 15:10:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2342wpy58.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219142933.13904-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> Implement JIT inlining of the 64-bit bitops kfuncs on arm64.
>
> bpf_clz64(), bpf_ffs64(), bpf_fls64(), and bpf_bitrev64() are always
> inlined using mandatory ARMv8 CLZ/RBIT instructions. bpf_ctz64() is
> inlined via RBIT + CLZ, or via the native CTZ instruction when
> FEAT_CSSC is available. bpf_rol64() and bpf_ror64() are always inlined
> via RORV.
>
> bpf_popcnt64() is not inlined as the native population count instruction
> requires NEON/SIMD registers, which should not be touched from BPF
> programs. It therefore falls back to a regular function call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
> ---
> arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 7a530ea4f5ae..f03f732063d9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -1192,6 +1192,127 @@ static int add_exception_handler(const struct bpf_insn *insn,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline u32 a64_clz64(u8 rd, u8 rn)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Arm Architecture Reference Manual for A-profile architecture
> + * (Document number: ARM DDI 0487)
> + *
> + * A64 Base Instruction Descriptions
> + * C6.2 Alphabetical list of A64 base instructions
> + *
> + * C6.2.91 CLZ
> + *
> + * Count leading zeros
> + *
> + * This instruction counts the number of consecutive binary zero bits,
> + * starting from the most significant bit in the source register,
> + * and places the count in the destination register.
> + */
> + /* CLZ Xd, Xn */
> + return 0xdac01000 | (rn << 5) | rd;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 a64_ctz64(u8 rd, u8 rn)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Arm Architecture Reference Manual for A-profile architecture
> + * (Document number: ARM DDI 0487)
> + *
> + * A64 Base Instruction Descriptions
> + * C6.2 Alphabetical list of A64 base instructions
> + *
> + * C6.2.144 CTZ
> + *
> + * Count trailing zeros
> + *
> + * This instruction counts the number of consecutive binary zero bits,
> + * starting from the least significant bit in the source register,
> + * and places the count in the destination register.
> + *
> + * This instruction requires FEAT_CSSC.
> + */
> + /* CTZ Xd, Xn */
> + return 0xdac01800 | (rn << 5) | rd;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 a64_rbit64(u8 rd, u8 rn)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Arm Architecture Reference Manual for A-profile architecture
> + * (Document number: ARM DDI 0487)
> + *
> + * A64 Base Instruction Descriptions
> + * C6.2 Alphabetical list of A64 base instructions
> + *
> + * C6.2.320 RBIT
> + *
> + * Reverse bits
> + *
> + * This instruction reverses the bit order in a register.
> + */
> + /* RBIT Xd, Xn */
> + return 0xdac00000 | (rn << 5) | rd;
> +}
Instead of hardcoding the instructions with the above functions, do it the
proper way something like the following patch (not compile tested):
-- >8 --
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
index 18c7811774d3..b2696af0b817 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ enum aarch64_insn_data1_type {
AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_REVERSE_16,
AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_REVERSE_32,
AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_REVERSE_64,
+ AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_RBIT,
+ AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_CLZ,
+ AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_CTZ,
};
enum aarch64_insn_data2_type {
@@ -389,6 +392,9 @@ __AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rorv, 0x7FE0FC00, 0x1AC02C00)
__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rev16, 0x7FFFFC00, 0x5AC00400)
__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rev32, 0x7FFFFC00, 0x5AC00800)
__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rev64, 0x7FFFFC00, 0x5AC00C00)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(rbit, 0x7FFFFC00, 0x5AC00000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(clz, 0x7FFFFC00, 0x5AC01000)
+__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(ctz, 0x7FFFFC00, 0x5AC01800)
__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(and, 0x7F200000, 0x0A000000)
__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(bic, 0x7F200000, 0x0A200000)
__AARCH64_INSN_FUNCS(orr, 0x7F200000, 0x2A000000)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
index 4e298baddc2e..2229ab596cda 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/lib/insn.c
@@ -1008,6 +1008,15 @@ u32 aarch64_insn_gen_data1(enum aarch64_insn_register dst,
}
insn = aarch64_insn_get_rev64_value();
break;
+ case AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_CLZ:
+ insn = aarch64_insn_get_clz_value();
+ break;
+ case AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_RBIT:
+ insn = aarch64_insn_get_rbit_value();
+ break;
+ case AARCH64_INSN_DATA1_CTZ:
+ insn = aarch64_insn_get_ctz_value();
+ break;
default:
pr_err("%s: unknown data1 encoding %d\n", __func__, type);
return AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
index bbea4f36f9f2..af806c39dadb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -248,6 +248,12 @@
#define A64_REV16(sf, Rd, Rn) A64_DATA1(sf, Rd, Rn, REVERSE_16)
#define A64_REV32(sf, Rd, Rn) A64_DATA1(sf, Rd, Rn, REVERSE_32)
#define A64_REV64(Rd, Rn) A64_DATA1(1, Rd, Rn, REVERSE_64)
+/* Rd = RBIT(Rn) */
+#define A64_RBIT(sf, Rd, Rn) A64_DATA1(sf, Rd, Rn, RBIT)
+/* Rd = CLZ(Rn) */
+#define A64_CLZ(sf, Rd, Rn) A64_DATA1(sf, Rd, Rn, CLZ)
+/* Rd = CTZ(Rn) */
+#define A64_CTZ(sf, Rd, Rn) A64_DATA1(sf, Rd, Rn, CTZ)
/* Data-processing (2 source) */
/* Rd = Rn OP Rm */
-- 8< --
Thanks,
Puranjay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-19 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-19 14:29 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Introduce 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] " Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:34 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-21 9:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-02-21 12:50 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf, x86: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support for x86_64 Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 17:47 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-20 15:54 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 17:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-21 12:45 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-21 16:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-02-23 16:35 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 22:05 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-20 14:12 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-20 11:59 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf, arm64: Add 64-bit bitops kfuncs support Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 15:10 ` Puranjay Mohan [this message]
2026-02-19 15:20 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:25 ` Puranjay Mohan
2026-02-19 15:36 ` Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add __cpu_feature annotation for CPU-feature-gated tests Leon Hwang
2026-02-19 14:29 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add JIT disassembly tests for 64-bit bitops kfuncs Leon Hwang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2342wpy58.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-patches-bot@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luis.gerhorst@fau.de \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yepeilin@google.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox