* Is iommu_num_pages() broken ?
@ 2012-08-05 0:16 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-05 6:39 ` Andreas Schwab
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2012-08-05 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel; +Cc: Anton Blanchard, FUJITA Tomonori, linux-kernel
Hi folks !
I stumbled upon this today:
static inline unsigned long iommu_num_pages(unsigned long addr,
unsigned long len,
unsigned long io_page_size)
{
unsigned long size = (addr & (io_page_size - 1)) + len;
return DIV_ROUND_UP(size, io_page_size);
}
That doesn't look right to me...
The powerpc iommu code at least uses that with an addr which may not be
page aligned (ie, result of sg_virt() which include the offset).
The above code will align the start before adding the len which is wrong
and will result in potentially missing a page or am I missing
something ?
Shouldn't it be something like
static inline unsigned long iommu_num_pages(unsigned long addr,
unsigned long len,
unsigned long io_page_size)
{
unsigned long start = addr & (io_page_size - 1);
unsigned long end = addr + len;
return DIV_ROUND_UP(end - start, io_page_size);
}
?
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Is iommu_num_pages() broken ?
2012-08-05 0:16 Is iommu_num_pages() broken ? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2012-08-05 6:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-08-05 6:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2012-08-05 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Cc: Joerg Roedel, Anton Blanchard, FUJITA Tomonori, linux-kernel
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:
> static inline unsigned long iommu_num_pages(unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long len,
> unsigned long io_page_size)
> {
> unsigned long size = (addr & (io_page_size - 1)) + len;
>
> return DIV_ROUND_UP(size, io_page_size);
> }
>
>
> That doesn't look right to me...
>
> The powerpc iommu code at least uses that with an addr which may not be
> page aligned (ie, result of sg_virt() which include the offset).
>
> The above code will align the start before adding the len which is wrong
addr & (io_page_size - 1) computes the offset into the page pointed to
by addr. Looks right to me.
addr & ~(io_page_size - 1) would round addr down to the start of the
page.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Is iommu_num_pages() broken ?
2012-08-05 6:39 ` Andreas Schwab
@ 2012-08-05 6:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2012-08-05 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Schwab
Cc: Joerg Roedel, Anton Blanchard, FUJITA Tomonori, linux-kernel
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 08:39 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> addr & (io_page_size - 1) computes the offset into the page pointed to
> by addr. Looks right to me.
>
> addr & ~(io_page_size - 1) would round addr down to the start of the
> page.
Ah that's right, for some reason I'm so used to seeing ~ before such
constructs that my brain must have imagined it :-)
Sorry for the noise. Next time I'll have coffee first then re-check ...
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-05 6:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-05 0:16 Is iommu_num_pages() broken ? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-08-05 6:39 ` Andreas Schwab
2012-08-05 6:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox