From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750933AbWGBIl7@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750933AbWGBIl7 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 2 Jul 2006 04:41:59 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751010AbWGBIl7
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 2 Jul 2006 04:41:59 -0400
Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.26]:25098 "EHLO
	smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750863AbWGBIl6 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 2 Jul 2006 04:41:58 -0400
To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Johan Vromans <jvromans@squirrel.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SMBus access
References: <m2irmhjb5t.fsf@phoenix.squirrel.nl>
	<20060701141015.a4922e86.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
From: Johan Vromans <jvromans@squirrel.nl>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 10:41:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20060701141015.a4922e86.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (Randy Dunlap's
 message of "Sat, 1 Jul 2006 14:10:15 -0700")
Message-ID: <m24py0e6uj.fsf@phoenix.squirrel.nl>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net> writes:

> a.  patch should also be sent to linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (cc-ed)
> b.  patch does not apply cleanly to latest kernel
> c.  missing Signed-off-by: line (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches)
> d.  incorrect patch filename directory level (see SubmittingPatches)

All procedural issues, than can easily be solved. So I take it there
are no technical/philosophical/emotional/ethical objections against
this change?

-- Johan