From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754111Ab1C2Uho (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:37:44 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:60199 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752180Ab1C2Uhn (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:37:43 -0400 From: Andreas Schwab To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Jiri Kosina , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Linux\/m68k" Subject: Re: [regression v2.6.38] Re: [PATCH v2] brk: fix min_brk lower bound computation for COMPAT_BRK References: X-Yow: Uh-oh!! I'm having TOO MUCH FUN!! Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:37:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Geert Uytterhoeven's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 22:24:21 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Seems like the binary doesn't like brk() rounding up the requested > value to the next page... >>From libc-5.4.46/libc/sysdeps/linux/m68k/__sbrk.c: void * __sbrk(ptrdiff_t increment) { if (__init_brk () == 0) { register void * tmp asm ("%d1") = ___brk_addr+increment; __asm__ volatile ("movel %1,%/d0\n\t" "trap #0\n\t" "movel %/d0,%0" :"=g" (___brk_addr) :"i" (SYS_brk),"g" (tmp) : "%d0"); if (___brk_addr == tmp) return tmp-increment; errno = ENOMEM; } return ((void *) -1); } Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."