From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753407AbdBJTlE (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:41:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:33943 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752447AbdBJTk7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:40:59 -0500 From: Kevin Hilman To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Sekhar Nori , Patrick Titiano , Michael Turquette , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Alexandre Bailon , David Lechner , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Lad Prabhakar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] ARM: davinci: add pdata-quirks for da850-evm vpif display Organization: BayLibre References: <1486485683-11427-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> <1486485683-11427-11-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:40:38 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1486485683-11427-11-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> (Bartosz Golaszewski's message of "Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:41:23 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bartosz, Bartosz Golaszewski writes: > Similarly to vpif capture: we need to register the vpif display driver > and the corresponding adv7343 encoder in pdata-quirks as the DT > support is not complete. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c > index 09f62ac..0a55546 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/pdata-quirks.c > @@ -9,13 +9,17 @@ > */ > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > #include > > +#define DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_VPIF_DISP 5 > + > struct pdata_init { > const char *compatible; > void (*fn)(void); > @@ -107,7 +111,78 @@ static struct vpif_capture_config da850_vpif_capture_config = { > }, > .card_name = "DA850/OMAP-L138 Video Capture", > }; > +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VIDEO_DAVINCI_VPIF_CAPTURE) */ > + > +#if defined(CONFIG_DA850_UI_SD_VIDEO_PORT) > +static void vpif_evm_display_setup(void) > +{ > + int gpio = DAVINCI_N_GPIO + DA850_EVM_UI_EXP_SEL_VPIF_DISP, ret; > + > + ret = gpio_request(gpio, "sel_c"); > + if (ret) { > + pr_warn("Cannot open UI expander pin %d\n", gpio); > + return; > + } > + > + gpio_direction_output(gpio, 0); > +} I had a closer look at the UI board schematic, and it looks like the SEL_C line of the GPIO exapander is actualy to select the VPIF *input* source, not output, so I don't think it should be needed in this patch. Can you test VPIF display works without calling this function? Kevin