From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:37:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:37:31 -0500 Received: from office.mandrakesoft.com ([195.68.114.34]:40445 "EHLO vador.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:37:30 -0500 To: Rusty Russell Cc: Jeff Garzik , kaos@ocs.com.au, Petr Vandrovec , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Modules in 2.5.47-bk... References: <20021114042738.2091E2C080@lists.samba.org> X-URL: Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:45:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20021114042738.2091E2C080@lists.samba.org> (Rusty Russell's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2002 16:22:10 +1100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2.92 (i386-mandrake-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rusty Russell writes: > > The backward compat thing is really a hack, and not system > > software done right :( modutils should not need to rename all its > > binaries *.old -- and have that be the default that users see when > > installing the rpm. No company worth its shareholders would > > release a package full of "*.old" binaries. Come on... > > OK, would calling it "*-2.4" or something help? most distros come with some alternative system (at lest, debian, mdk & rh), so this problem can legally be left to vendors.