From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756231Ab1H3Tbl (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:31:41 -0400 Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:54016 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756161Ab1H3Tbi (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:31:38 -0400 From: Chris Ball To: Stephen Warren Cc: Grant Likely , Olof Johansson , Shawn Guo , "linux-mmc\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-tegra\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree-discuss\@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm/dt: Tegra: Update SDHCI nodes to match bindings References: <1314731837-6985-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B3279E01@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:31:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF04B3279E01@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> (Stephen Warren's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:26:16 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, Aug 30 2011, Stephen Warren wrote: > I don't think there's actually any need for that; initializing Tegra's > SDHCI from device-tree has never worked in mainline to date; it relies > on patch 1 being there. And if patch 2 was there without patch 3, > the worst that will happen is some port runs in 4-bit mode instead of > 8-bit, which evidently works fine since I didn't even notice 8-bit > support was missing... Ah, okay. I've merged patch 2 to mmc-next for 3.2, then, and will keep an eye on what happens with the arch patches. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child