From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 06:04:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 06:04:48 -0400 Received: from [213.98.126.44] ([213.98.126.44]:47774 "HELO trasno.mitica") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 06:04:35 -0400 To: landley@webofficenow.com Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman), Alan Chandler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Microsoft and Xenix. In-Reply-To: <01062310075401.00696@localhost.localdomain> <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain> X-Url: http://www.lfcia.org/~quintela From: Juan Quintela In-Reply-To: <01062406364601.01519@localhost.localdomain> Date: 02 Jul 2001 12:04:53 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "rob" == Rob Landley writes: rob> On Saturday 23 June 2001 22:47, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Rob Landley writes: >> > Ummm... GEM was the Geos stuff? (Yeah I remember it, I haven't >> > researched it yet though...) >> >> GEM was a gui from Digital Research I believe. >> Geoworks/Geos was a seperate entity. rob> Ah, the DR-DOS answer to dosshell/windows. Cool. (I used Dr. Dos byt never rob> tried its gui.) Nope. GEM is older that dosshell, if I remember correctly, dosshell appeared with dos 4.x, and GEM was there with DOS 3.x (was x = 22?). I also had DOS+ from Digital Research in my Amstrad PC1512. Later, Juan. -- In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they are different -- Larry McVoy