From: "Johan Kullstam" <kullstam@ne.mediaone.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: multiprocessor kernel problem
Date: 03 Dec 2000 19:22:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2elzp3uiq.fsf@euler.axel.nom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001203020904.31A2C813F@halfway.linuxcare.com.au>
In-Reply-To: Rusty Russell's message of "Sun, 03 Dec 2000 13:08:53 +1100"
Rusty Russell <rusty@linuxcare.com.au> writes:
> In message <3A27D4D6.4DA47346@lanl.gov> you write:
> >
> > I have 2.4.0 test 10 and test 11 installed on a multiprocessor (Intel)
> > machine. I have tried both test versions of the kernel. I configured
> > the kernel for single
> > and multi processor. When I boot single processor, iptables will run
> > fine. When I boot the machine with the multiprocessor kernel and run
> > iptables, the kernel dumps several pages of hex and the final two lines
> > of output are:
> >
> > Killing interrupt handler
> > scheduling in interrupt
>
> My development box (running test10pre5) is SMP, and it works fine.
yes, but is it a dual machine or is it an N-way SMP with N > 2? the
other guy with iptables/SMP problems also has a quad box. could this
perhaps be a problem only when you have more than two processors?
> I
> haven't updated to the latest kernel version because I like my
> filesystems in one piece, and the netfilter code hasn't changed.
>
> What is your kernel configuration, and iptables version? Have you
> patched the kernel?
i tried 2.4.0-test10 (no patches) with iptables 1.1.2. this is an alr
revolution quad6 (4 ppros).
i posted this to the netfilter mailing list a while back.
<URL:http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/netfilter/2000-November/005838.html>
--
J o h a n K u l l s t a m
[kullstam@ne.mediaone.net]
Don't Fear the Penguin!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-12-04 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-01 16:41 multiprocessor kernel problem Roger Crandell
2000-12-01 22:48 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-12-01 23:01 ` Keith Owens
2000-12-02 16:12 ` Johan Kullstam
2000-12-03 2:08 ` Rusty Russell
2000-12-04 0:22 ` Johan Kullstam [this message]
2000-12-04 5:21 ` Rusty Russell
2000-12-04 20:56 ` Roger Crandell
2000-12-04 23:53 ` Johan Kullstam
2000-12-04 1:30 ` Roger Crandell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-01 16:57 Roger Crandell
2000-12-02 16:15 ` Johan Kullstam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2elzp3uiq.fsf@euler.axel.nom \
--to=kullstam@ne.mediaone.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox