From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754381AbcHSDPB (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:15:01 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:33607 "EHLO mail-io0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848AbcHSDO4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2016 23:14:56 -0400 From: Kevin Hilman To: Finlye Xiao Cc: srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, heiko@sntech.de, robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org, dbaryshkov@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, nm@ti.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, sboyd@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, wxt@rock-chips.com, jay.xu@rock-chips.com, rocky.hao@rock-chips.com, tim.chen@rock-chips.com, tony.xie@rock-chips.com, ulysses.huang@rock-chips.com, lin.huang@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] nvmem: rockchip-efuse: Change initcall to subsys Organization: BayLibre References: <1471510341-63926-1-git-send-email-finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> <1471510341-63926-2-git-send-email-finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 13:28:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1471510341-63926-2-git-send-email-finley.xiao@rock-chips.com> (Finlye Xiao's message of "Thu, 18 Aug 2016 16:52:18 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Finlye Xiao writes: > From: Finley Xiao > > We will register a cpufreq notifier for adjusting opp's voltage, and it > need to fetch cpu's leakage from efuse in the notifier_call. so the efuse > driver should probe before cpufreq driver. > > Signed-off-by: Finley Xiao Why can't this be handled with deferred probling? initcall ordering is a can of worms. Kevin