From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758301Ab2IGVbV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:31:21 -0400
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:5926 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751599Ab2IGVbN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 Sep 2012 17:31:13 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,387,1344236400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="219568929"
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: james northrup <northrup.james@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Johannes Stezenbach <js@sig21.net>,
        richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
        "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus@oberhumer.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@openedhand.com>,
        Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>, chris.mason@fusionio.com,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Update LZO compression
References: <50299142.2030504@oberhumer.com>
	<20120814123937.GA14756@sig21.net> <502B8FE3.7080501@oberhumer.com>
	<20120815144539.GA8300@sig21.net> <502C92C3.7090701@oberhumer.com>
	<20120816150647.GA22010@sig21.net> <20120816232549.4d14a6aa@natsu>
	<20120816175234.GL11413@one.firstfloor.org>
	<CAMuHMdWK_Y=QwkgQD6K8tFBLaO04Fy0yVAzEpb2OYW6Ec0hGoA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPkEcwgv6f5B+Mrw7kzrHcZ5JZ+Yr0o=bLdoFqCB-e4CLiVx5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:31:12 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAPkEcwgv6f5B+Mrw7kzrHcZ5JZ+Yr0o=bLdoFqCB-e4CLiVx5A@mail.gmail.com>
	(james northrup's message of "Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:55:06 -0700")
Message-ID: <m2mx114j1b.fsf@firstfloor.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

james northrup <northrup.james@gmail.com> writes:

> looks like ARM results are inconclusive from a lot of folks without bandwidth
> to do a write-up, what about just plain STAGING status for ARM so the android
> tweakers can beat on it for a while?  

Again staging doesn't really work for a core library, it's more
for separate drivers.

FWIW we did some tests and the new library seems to be generally faster
on x86.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only