The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi <abd.masalkhi@gmail.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	song@kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io, magiclinan@didiglobal.com,
	xiao@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] md/raid10: consistently fail atomic writes that require splitting
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 13:16:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2o6g8ec4i.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f8554f5b-5a3f-4972-8bea-36fe983ded5e@oracle.com>


Hi John,

On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 11:49 +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 15/07/2026 11:05, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 10:25 +0100, John Garry wrote:
>>> On 10/07/2026 11:15, Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi wrote:
>>>> RAID10 currently handles one badblock path explicitly by failing atomic
>>>> writes with EIO. However, another badblock path can also reduce the
>>>> writable range and force the bio through bio_submit_split_bioset(),
>>>
>>> What is this other badblock path which you are referring to?
>>>
>> The other path is when the requested write overlaps a bad-block region
>> from the beginning, but the intended write extends beyond the bad-block
>> region. In that case, the current code silently reduces max_sectors.
>> As a result, we end up calling bio_submit_split_bioset(), which
>> completes the bio with -EINVAL rather than -EIO. This is the same issue
>> that existed in raid1 and was fixed by patch 2.
>
> OK, it would be nice to add a concise version of that info to the commit 
> log.
>
Thanks. I'll update the commit log accordingly and send v5.

> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>

-- 
Best Regards,
Abd-Alrhman

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 11:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-10 10:15 [PATCH v4 0/7] md/raid10: fixes, atomic write handling, and error-path cleanup Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] md/raid10: fix r10bio leak in raid10_write_request() error paths Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-15  7:35   ` yu kuai
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] md/raid1: restrict atomic write limits and handle runtime constraints Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-15  9:09   ` yu kuai
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] md/raid10: consistently fail atomic writes that require splitting Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-15  9:10   ` yu kuai
2026-07-15  9:25   ` John Garry
2026-07-15 10:05     ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-15 10:49       ` John Garry
2026-07-15 11:16         ` Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi [this message]
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] md/raid10: remove unnecessary barrier around bio_submit_split_bioset() Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] md/raid10: replace wait loop with wait_event_idle() Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] md/raid10: simplify write request error handling Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi
2026-07-10 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] md/raid10: simplify read " Abd-Alrhman Masalkhi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2o6g8ec4i.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=abd.masalkhi@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magiclinan@didiglobal.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiao@kernel.org \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox