From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
To: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: On emulation failure, convey the exit reason to userspace
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 09:44:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2pmw114w5.fsf@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNygagjfTIuptxL8@google.com>
On Wednesday, 2021-06-30 at 16:48:42 UTC, David Matlack wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 06:31:52PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> To aid in debugging.
>
> Please add more context to the commit message.
Okay.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------
>> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> index 8166ad113fb2..48ef0dc68faf 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> @@ -7455,7 +7455,7 @@ void kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq, int inc_eip)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_inject_realmode_interrupt);
>>
>> -static void prepare_emulation_failure_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +static void prepare_emulation_failure_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t flags)
>> {
>> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt = vcpu->arch.emulate_ctxt;
>> u32 insn_size = ctxt->fetch.end - ctxt->fetch.data;
>> @@ -7466,7 +7466,8 @@ static void prepare_emulation_failure_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> run->emulation_failure.ndata = 0;
>> run->emulation_failure.flags = 0;
>>
>> - if (insn_size) {
>> + if (insn_size &&
>> + (flags & KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_INSTRUCTION_BYTES)) {
>> run->emulation_failure.ndata = 3;
>> run->emulation_failure.flags |=
>> KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_INSTRUCTION_BYTES;
>> @@ -7476,6 +7477,14 @@ static void prepare_emulation_failure_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> memcpy(run->emulation_failure.insn_bytes,
>> ctxt->fetch.data, insn_size);
>> }
>> +
>> + if (flags & KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_EXIT_REASON) {
>
> This flag is always passed so this check if superfluous. Perhaps change
> `int flags` to `bool instruction_bytes` and have it control only whether
> the instruction bytes are populated.
Okay.
>> + run->emulation_failure.ndata = 4;
>> + run->emulation_failure.flags |=
>> + KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_EXIT_REASON;
>> + run->emulation_failure.exit_reason =
>> + static_call(kvm_x86_get_exit_reason)(vcpu);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static int handle_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emulation_type)
>> @@ -7492,16 +7501,18 @@ static int handle_emulation_failure(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int emulation_type)
>>
>> if (kvm->arch.exit_on_emulation_error ||
>> (emulation_type & EMULTYPE_SKIP)) {
>> - prepare_emulation_failure_exit(vcpu);
>> + prepare_emulation_failure_exit(
>> + vcpu,
>> + KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_INSTRUCTION_BYTES |
>> + KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_EXIT_REASON);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
>>
>> if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) && static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) == 0) {
>> - vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_INTERNAL_ERROR;
>> - vcpu->run->internal.suberror = KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION;
>> - vcpu->run->internal.ndata = 0;
>> + prepare_emulation_failure_exit(
>> + vcpu, KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_EXIT_REASON);
>
> Should kvm_task_switch and kvm_handle_memory_failure also be updated
> like this?
Will do in v2.
sgx_handle_emulation_failure() seems like an existing user of
KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION that doesn't follow the new protocol (use
the emulation_failure part of the union).
Sean: If I add another flag for this case, what is the existing
user-level consumer?
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index 68c9e6d8bbda..3e4126652a67 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ struct kvm_xen_exit {
>>
>> /* Flags that describe what fields in emulation_failure hold valid data. */
>> #define KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_INSTRUCTION_BYTES (1ULL << 0)
>> +#define KVM_INTERNAL_ERROR_EMULATION_FLAG_EXIT_REASON (1ULL << 1)
>>
>> /* for KVM_RUN, returned by mmap(vcpu_fd, offset=0) */
>> struct kvm_run {
>> @@ -404,6 +405,7 @@ struct kvm_run {
>> __u64 flags;
>> __u8 insn_size;
>> __u8 insn_bytes[15];
>> + __u64 exit_reason;
>
> Please document what this field contains, especially since its contents
> depend on AMD versus Intel.
Okay.
>> } emulation_failure;
>> /* KVM_EXIT_OSI */
>> struct {
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>>
dme.
--
Welcome to Conditioning.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-02 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 17:31 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Convey the exit reason to user-space on emulation failure David Edmondson
2021-06-28 17:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: Add kvm_x86_ops.get_exit_reason David Edmondson
2021-06-30 16:36 ` David Matlack
2021-06-28 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: On emulation failure, convey the exit reason to userspace David Edmondson
2021-06-30 16:48 ` David Matlack
2021-07-02 8:44 ` David Edmondson [this message]
2021-07-09 21:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-07-29 13:48 ` David Edmondson
2021-06-30 16:33 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: x86: Convey the exit reason to user-space on emulation failure David Matlack
2021-06-30 17:08 ` David Matlack
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2pmw114w5.fsf@oracle.com \
--to=david.edmondson@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox