From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753883Ab1FDUSq (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:18:46 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:3897 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753809Ab1FDUSp (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2011 16:18:45 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,320,1304319600"; d="scan'208";a="9084933" From: Andi Kleen To: "George Spelvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to measure enable_kernel_fpu overhead? References: <20110603172652.11807.qmail@science.horizon.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:17:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110603172652.11807.qmail@science.horizon.com> (George Spelvin's message of "3 Jun 2011 13:26:52 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "George Spelvin" writes: > > Does anyone have any suggestions? This seems to clever for its own good. Even if you come up with some number on one CPU it could be completely different on another. I would suggest KISS. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only