From: "Johan Kullstam" <kullstam@ne.mediaone.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor SCSI drive performance on SMP machine, 2.2.16
Date: 28 Jan 2001 18:50:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2wvbfi6dj.fsf@euler.axel.nom> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003f01c088fb$a35c06e0$b001a8c0@caesar> <20010128174016.3fba71ad.bruce@ask.ne.jp> <002901c08951$f751bfa0$b001a8c0@caesar>
In-Reply-To: <002901c08951$f751bfa0$b001a8c0@caesar>
"paradox3" <paradox3@maine.rr.com> writes:
> I did this:
>
> date
> dd if=/dev/zero of=TESTFILE bs=1024 count=102400
> date
> sync
> date
>
>
> and I gave the time differences from the first to the last
> timestamp.
hmm. i ran this on my old ppro200 with adaptec 2940uw and ibm
DDRS-39130W drive.
sophia(jk)$ cat foo
date
dd if=/dev/zero of=TESTFILE bs=1024 count=102400
date
sync
sync
sync
date
i get
sophia(jk)$ time bash foo
Sun Jan 28 18:41:52 EST 2001
102400+0 records in
102400+0 records out
Sun Jan 28 18:42:11 EST 2001
Sun Jan 28 18:42:13 EST 2001
real 0m20.803s
user 0m0.400s
sys 0m8.780s
and this during a full kernel compile.
i get similar decent results using my other computer with a symbios
8751sp and fujitsu and seagate drives.
something must be messed up in a configuration somewhere. are you
sure you are running the drive in synchronous ultra wide mode? is you
termination good?
> Regards, Para-dox (paradox3@maine.rr.com)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Harada" <bruce@ask.ne.jp>
> To: "paradox3" <paradox3@maine.rr.com>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 2:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Poor SCSI drive performance on SMP machine, 2.2.16
>
>
> >
> > Hm. As a point of comparison, I use a similar system to yours (full SCSI,
> > though, no IDE) and I can copy a 100MB file from disk-to-disk, or on the
> > same disk, in around 13 seconds. Where are you copying to the SCSI drive
> > from - the same drive, an IDE disk, CDROM? If IDE, what are its
> > particulars? (Check with hdparm -iI /dev/hd?)
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Harada
> > bruce@ask.ne.jp
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:44:29 -0500
> > "paradox3" <paradox3@maine.rr.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't get any messages relating to the drives in any syslog output.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you get messages like the ones below in /var/log/messages?
> > > >
> > > > sym53c875-0-<0,0>: QUEUE FULL! 8 busy, 7 disconnected CCBs
> > > > sym53c875-0-<0,0>: tagged command queue depth set to 7
> > > >
> > > > In fact, do you get any messages in your log files that look like they
> > > > might be related?
> > > >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
J o h a n K u l l s t a m
[kullstam@ne.mediaone.net]
Don't Fear the Penguin!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-28 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-28 7:26 Poor SCSI drive performance on SMP machine, 2.2.16 paradox3
2001-01-28 7:48 ` Andre Hedrick
2001-01-28 8:40 ` Bruce Harada
2001-01-28 17:44 ` paradox3
2001-01-28 19:31 ` Bruce Harada
2001-01-28 19:52 ` paradox3
2001-01-28 19:56 ` paradox3
2001-01-28 23:50 ` Johan Kullstam [this message]
2001-01-28 11:12 ` Gérard Roudier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-28 22:57 paradox3
[not found] <F65Jqj0CYixMwInhdAH00002ef1@hotmail.com>
2001-01-29 5:02 ` paradox3
2001-01-29 12:58 ` Johan Kullstam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2wvbfi6dj.fsf@euler.axel.nom \
--to=kullstam@ne.mediaone.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox