Re: 2.7 thoughts: common well-architected object model

viro
2003-10-14T06:46:55Z

On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 10:31:55PM -0700, retu wrote:
> Now here's the competition:
>
> System
[snip the revolting offense against Occam's Razor]
> System.Xml.Xsl
>
> These are massive and can't be built in a day. But
> with a very decent component model and design
> philosphy on what to put in and what not it would
> enable people to quickly fill in the blanks (plus
> maybe some rapid abstracting/wrapping) which would do
> a very lot for the OS.

Please, take your cargo-cult education somewhere else. You are yet to
show that you understand what does "component model" mean, let alone
to demonstrate that you are capable of discussing benefits of such
beasts. "It had been mentioned in lecture notes" doesn't cut it.