From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel is unstable
Date: 02 Mar 2001 09:23:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31ysgy3ye.fsf@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010301153935.G32484@athlon.random> <E14YXh5-0008GQ-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010301193017.E15051@athlon.random> <97m6ue$7uu$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <97m6ue$7uu$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
Hi Linus,
On 1 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Note how do_brk() does the merging itself (see the comment "Can we
> just expand an old anonymous mapping?"), and that it's basically
> free when done that way, with no worries about locking etc. The same
> could be done fairly trivially in mmap too, but I never saw any real
> usage patterns that made it look all that worthwhile (*). Handling
> the mmap case the same way do_brk() does it would fix the behaviour
> of this pathological example too..
Oh there is at least one application, which does trigger the merging
quite often: SAP R/3. We have a big memory area which is handled in 1M
blocks which get mmaped/munmapped/mprotected all the time. This now
leads to a really big avl tree which before has been much smaller.
I am not sure that the merging is a gain since it in itself is a
overhead and we work on fixed blocks. I simply wanted to point out
that there are applications out there which trigger it.
Greetings
Christoph
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-02 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-01 9:16 Kernel is unstable Ivan Stepnikov
2001-03-01 10:27 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-03-01 14:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 14:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 18:20 ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 18:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 19:04 ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 20:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-02 8:23 ` Christoph Rohland [this message]
2001-03-02 8:40 ` David Howells
2001-03-02 14:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-02 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-05 23:06 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-03-01 13:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-03-01 14:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 17:12 ` Ingo Oeser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-01 13:55 Heusden, Folkert van
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m31ysgy3ye.fsf@linux.local \
--to=cr@sap.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox