The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Rohland <cr@sap.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel is unstable
Date: 02 Mar 2001 09:23:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m31ysgy3ye.fsf@linux.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010301153935.G32484@athlon.random> <E14YXh5-0008GQ-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20010301193017.E15051@athlon.random> <97m6ue$7uu$1@penguin.transmeta.com>
In-Reply-To: <97m6ue$7uu$1@penguin.transmeta.com>

Hi Linus,

On 1 Mar 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Note how do_brk() does the merging itself (see the comment "Can we
> just expand an old anonymous mapping?"), and that it's basically
> free when done that way, with no worries about locking etc. The same
> could be done fairly trivially in mmap too, but I never saw any real
> usage patterns that made it look all that worthwhile (*). Handling
> the mmap case the same way do_brk() does it would fix the behaviour
> of this pathological example too..

Oh there is at least one application, which does trigger the merging
quite often: SAP R/3. We have a big memory area which is handled in 1M
blocks which get mmaped/munmapped/mprotected all the time. This now
leads to a really big avl tree which before has been much smaller.

I am not sure that the merging is a gain since it in itself is a
overhead and we work on fixed blocks. I simply wanted to point out
that there are applications out there which trigger it.

Greetings
		Christoph


  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-02  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-01  9:16 Kernel is unstable Ivan Stepnikov
2001-03-01 10:27 ` Matti Aarnio
2001-03-01 14:35   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 14:39     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 18:20       ` Alan Cox
2001-03-01 18:30         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 19:04           ` David S. Miller
2001-03-01 20:45             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 19:12           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-02  8:23             ` Christoph Rohland [this message]
2001-03-02  8:40             ` David Howells
2001-03-02 14:01               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-02 17:52               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-05 23:06                 ` Chris Wedgwood
2001-03-01 13:39 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-03-01 14:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-03-01 17:12   ` Ingo Oeser
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-01 13:55 Heusden, Folkert van

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m31ysgy3ye.fsf@linux.local \
    --to=cr@sap.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox