public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Abramo Bagnara <abramo@alsa-project.org>,
	Alon Ziv <alonz@nolaviz.org>,
	Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Kravetz <mkravetz@sequent.com>
Subject: Re: light weight user level semaphores
Date: 19 Apr 2001 19:45:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33db4xpap.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0104192044300.19860-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: Alexander Viro's message of "Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:35:02 -0400 (EDT)"

Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu> writes:

> > If the new interface can be useful for anything it must allow to
> > implement process-shared POSIX mutexes.
> 
> Pardon me the bluntness, but... Why?

Because otherwise there is no reason to even waste a second with this.
At least for me and everybody else who has interest in portable solutions.

I don't care how it's implemented.  Look at the code example I posted.
If you can provide an implementation which can implement anonymous
inter-process mutexes then ring again.  Until then I'll wait.  If you
implement something else I couldn't care less since it's useless for
me.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-20  2:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20010417114433.D1108@w-mikek2.sequent.com>
2001-04-17 19:48 ` light weight user level semaphores Linus Torvalds
2001-04-18 18:13   ` Bernd Eckenfels
2001-04-18 19:35   ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19  8:20     ` Alon Ziv
2001-04-19  8:52       ` Abramo Bagnara
2001-04-19  9:08         ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-19 10:44           ` Abramo Bagnara
2001-04-19 16:11         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 16:33           ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-19 16:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 17:33               ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-19 17:38                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 18:24                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-19 19:26                   ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19 19:35                     ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 20:06                       ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19 20:11                         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 20:26                           ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19 20:22                     ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-19 20:40                       ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19 20:51                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 21:38                       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 20:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 21:18                       ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19 21:41                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 22:46                           ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-20  1:35                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-20  2:45                               ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2001-04-19 16:43           ` Abramo Bagnara
2001-04-19 20:47           ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-19 20:54             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19  9:08       ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-19 11:51       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 16:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 16:38         ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 16:46           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-19 17:12             ` Alan Cox
2001-04-19 22:35               ` Rogier Wolff
2001-04-20  9:29             ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-20 14:19               ` Jesse Pollard
2001-04-20 18:36                 ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-20 23:33               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-04-21  4:06                 ` fd allocation [was: light weight user level semaphores] Edgar Toernig
2001-04-22  9:48                   ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-22 11:41                     ` light weight user level semaphores Alon Ziv
2001-04-22 12:44                       ` Alan Cox
2001-04-22 15:19                         ` Alon Ziv
2001-04-22 14:31                           ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-22 16:08                             ` Alon Ziv
2001-04-22 11:41                     ` Alon Ziv
2001-04-22 14:18                     ` David Woodhouse
2001-04-23 13:19                       ` David Howells
2001-04-23 14:48                         ` Alon Ziv
2001-04-23 15:40                           ` David Howells
2001-04-21 10:13                 ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-23 15:34                 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-04-23 19:18             ` Ingo Oeser
2001-04-24  0:19             ` David Wagner
2001-04-24  0:41               ` Alexander Viro
2001-04-19 19:47           ` Ulrich Drepper
2001-04-19 18:48         ` Olaf Titz
2001-04-19 13:59 George Talbot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33db4xpap.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com \
    --to=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=abramo@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=alonz@nolaviz.org \
    --cc=drepper@cygnus.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkravetz@sequent.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox