Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] On Semi AR0521 sensor driver

["Krzysztof Hałasa" <khalasa@piap.pl>]

Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org> writes:

> In subject
>
> "media: i2c:"
>
> Same for 1/2 where permutation of "media: dt-bindings: i2c:" are used
> when adding bindings for media i2c drivers.

You know, it's rather hard to know all these tiny requirements. Let
alone get them right all the time.

>> +	pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev);
>> +	pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev);
>> +	pm_runtime_idle(&client->dev);
>
> Do you have an _idle() callback ? This seems a no-op to me, or am I
> mistaken ? (runtime_pm is still cryptic to me sometimes)

Do you mean only the pm_runtime_idle()? Sakari just requested I add it.

> Can't you just remove power_on() if it's not needed ?

It wouldn't work without CONFIG_PM then, would it?

> There still are a few checkpatch warnings which might be worth
> considering  but nothing huge.

Do you mean this?

WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
#411: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c:351:
+               /* Reset gain, the sensor may produce all white pixels without
+                  this */

WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
#411: FILE: drivers/media/i2c/ar0521.c:351:
+                  this */

... which are about a single comment which I had to wrap to fit in 80
columns, hardly a block comment by my standards. Not to mention Linus
saying...
-- 
Krzysztof "Chris" Hałasa

Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz
Przemysłowy Instytut Automatyki i Pomiarów PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warszawa