From: Arnaud Patard <apatard@mandriva.com>
To: David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>,
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: automated test? (was Re: Linux 2.6.17.7)
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:10:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ac6xzbqx.fsf@anduin.mandriva.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0607250945400.9159@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz> (David Lang's message of "Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:47:43 -0700 (PDT)")
David Lang <dlang@digitalinsight.com> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 25 July 2006 10:55, Arnaud Patard wrote:
>>> Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> writes:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>> We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.17.7 kernel.
>>>
>>> Sorry, but doesn't compile if DVB_BUDGET_AV is set :(
>>>
>>>> Andrew de Quincey:
>>>> v4l/dvb: Fix budget-av frontend detection
>>
>>
>> In fact it is just this patch causing the problem:
> <SNIP>
>> Sorry, I had so much work going on in that area I must have diffed the wrong
>> kernel when I created this patch. :(
>
> is it reasonable to have an aotomated test figure out what config options are
> relavent to a patch (or patchset) and test compile all the combinations to catch
> this sort of mistake?
you'll probably need to find some heuristics which may be quite hard to
do. It would be easier imho to use some scripts like this one :
http://developer.osdl.org/~cherry/compile/
It's often enough to catch compile failures
Arnaud Patard
>
> David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-25 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-25 3:42 Linux 2.6.17.7 Greg KH
2006-07-25 3:43 ` Greg KH
2006-07-25 9:55 ` Arnaud Patard
2006-07-25 10:23 ` Andrew de Quincey
2006-07-25 16:47 ` automated test? (was Re: Linux 2.6.17.7) David Lang
2006-07-25 16:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-25 17:07 ` Michael Krufky
2006-07-25 18:42 ` Jean Delvare
2006-07-25 19:26 ` Andrew de Quincey
2006-07-25 21:20 ` Matthias Andree
2006-07-25 21:28 ` David Lang
2006-07-25 20:10 ` Arnaud Patard [this message]
2006-07-26 13:02 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-26 14:10 ` Andrew de Quincey
2006-07-26 14:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-26 14:39 ` Andrew de Quincey
2006-07-26 15:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-26 15:07 ` Andrew de Quincey
2006-07-26 17:11 ` David Lang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-07-26 17:15 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ac6xzbqx.fsf@anduin.mandriva.com \
--to=apatard@mandriva.com \
--cc=adq_dvb@lidskialf.net \
--cc=dlang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox