From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263150AbUCZFZh (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:25:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263947AbUCZFZh (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:25:37 -0500 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:36360 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263150AbUCZFZd (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:25:33 -0500 To: John Lee cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler v1.1 References: <1DQZ8-3XZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <1DRLx-4Ag-7@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 02:26:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1DRLx-4Ag-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (John Lee's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2004 06:10:07 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org John Lee writes: > > On the contrary, any reports of strange/bad behaviour are useful. It > probably is related to the scheduler, as no one seems to have reported > this problem with stock 2.6.4. Actually I saw it on 2.6.5rc2 with your scheduler patch merged (and my x86-64 patchkit, but that is unlikely to affect scheduling decisions). -Andi