Re: [patch] Workqueue Abstraction, 2.5.40-H7

Ingo Molnar
2002-10-01T21:19:54Z

On 1 Oct 2002, Jes Sorensen wrote:

> The point here is that it probably makes the code easier for you to
> read, but it makes it harder for a lot of other people since it's
> inconsistent with the standard. [...]

i began the whole line of argument with this sentence:

> *If* the consistent convention were to use the _t postfix for complex
> 'derived' types, it would create more compact and more readable kernel
> code.

furthermore:

> I agree that consistency is more important than having the absolute best
> rules, [...]

so i think we are in violent agreement regarding consistency.

Ingo