From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268116AbUHKQgy (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:36:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268108AbUHKQgw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:36:52 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:12037 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268128AbUHKQgW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:36:22 -0400 To: prasanna@in.ibm.com cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [1/4] Exceptions Notifier patch References: <2s3ZC-7Zq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:36:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2s3ZC-7Zq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (Prasanna S. Panchamukhi's message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2004 18:20:08 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Prasanna S Panchamukhi writes: Just some cosmetical comments. > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_die_chain_notify); Please name it "register_die_notifier" > > static int kstack_depth_to_print = 24; > +struct notifier_block *i386die_chain; > +static DECLARE_MUTEX(i386die_chain_mutex); s/i386// I don't know why you made this a mutex, a spinlock would be fine too. But that's a minor issue. Rest looks ok. -Andi