From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265155AbTLWPBJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:01:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265158AbTLWPBJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:01:09 -0500 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:32004 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265155AbTLWPBH (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:01:07 -0500 To: Christophe Saout Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] Add dm-crypt target From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:29:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <15Gg9-4H6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (Christophe Saout's message of "Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:00:25 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i586-suse-linux) References: <15G6g-4oz-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <15Gg9-4H6-25@gated-at.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christophe Saout writes: > this is the actual dm-crypt target. It uses cryptoapi to achive the same > goal as cryptoloop. > > It uses mempools to ensure not to ever run out of memory and can split > large IOs into smaller ones under memory pressure. > > Tested by some people, also works on a swap device. Is the IV argument compatible to block backed loop? If not it would not be possible to use existing block based loop crypto file systems this way. -Andi