From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264641AbUFGQlP (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:41:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264923AbUFGQlO (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:41:14 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:15364 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264641AbUFGQlJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Jun 2004 12:41:09 -0400 To: cc: j.dittmer@portrix.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: new icc kernel patch available (with kernel PGO) References: <24uHQ-6XR-49@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:40:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <24uHQ-6XR-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (ingo@pyrillion.org's message of "Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:00:22 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org writes: > I published some preliminary results in the German Linux Magazine, which > are copyrighted now. Sorry. > Some hints: maximum performance gain approx. 40%, avg. perf. gain: > approx. 8%; computed by LMBench+OProfile (accurate CPU cycle > measurement, 10us timer resolution). These were with profiling feedback, right? What training set did you use for it? -Andi