From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262319AbTJNK3c (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:29:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262321AbTJNK3c (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:29:32 -0400 Received: from hq.pm.waw.pl ([195.116.170.10]:11439 "EHLO hq.pm.waw.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262319AbTJNK3b (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Oct 2003 06:29:31 -0400 To: Cc: Subject: Re: [2.7TH 0.4]Thoughts References: From: Krzysztof Halasa Date: 14 Oct 2003 12:29:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org writes: > Already in: > > * Software RAID 0+1 perhaps? > A lot of hardware RAID cards support it, why not the > kernel? By RAID 0+1 I mean mirror-RAIDing two (or more) > stripe-RAID arrays. (Or can this be done already?) I think so. And better: stripe-RAIDing two or more mirror-RAIDs. -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH