From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:27:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3isc1smag.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2oEEn-197-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (Peter Williams's message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2004 08:40:07 +0200")
Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au> writes:
> Version 3 of the various single priority array scheduler patches for
> 2.6.7, 2.6.8-rc2 and 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 kernels are now available for
> download and evaluation:
[...] So many schedulers. It is hard to chose one for testing.
Do you have one you prefer and would like to be tested especially?
Perhaps a few standard benchmark numbers for the different ones
(e.g. volanomark or hackbench or the OSDL SDL tests) would make it
easier to preselect.
Have you considered submitting one to -mm* for wider testing?
-Andi
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-02 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <2oEEn-197-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-02 13:27 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-08-03 0:27 ` [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation Peter Williams
2004-08-03 3:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-08-03 4:38 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03 6:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-08-07 1:44 Peter Williams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-08-02 6:31 Peter Williams
2004-08-02 13:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-03 0:33 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03 2:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-03 3:39 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-03 10:49 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04 0:37 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-04 0:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04 1:36 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-04 1:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-04 2:40 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-04 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-04 7:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05 1:06 ` Peter Williams
2004-08-05 2:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-05 2:12 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3isc1smag.fsf@averell.firstfloor.org \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox