From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266517AbUHBN1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:27:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266514AbUHBN1N (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:27:13 -0400 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:60172 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266517AbUHBN1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Aug 2004 09:27:07 -0400 To: Peter Williams cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] V-3.0 Single Priority Array O(1) CPU Scheduler Evaluation References: <2oEEn-197-9@gated-at.bofh.it> From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 15:27:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <2oEEn-197-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (Peter Williams's message of "Mon, 02 Aug 2004 08:40:07 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Williams writes: > Version 3 of the various single priority array scheduler patches for > 2.6.7, 2.6.8-rc2 and 2.6.8-rc2-mm1 kernels are now available for > download and evaluation: [...] So many schedulers. It is hard to chose one for testing. Do you have one you prefer and would like to be tested especially? Perhaps a few standard benchmark numbers for the different ones (e.g. volanomark or hackbench or the OSDL SDL tests) would make it easier to preselect. Have you considered submitting one to -mm* for wider testing? -Andi