From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263763AbTLOO6f (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:58:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263764AbTLOO6f (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:58:35 -0500 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:37640 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263763AbTLOO6e (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:58:34 -0500 To: Vladimir Kondratiev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PCI Express support for 2.4 kernel From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:58:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <12Z5u-1tG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (Vladimir Kondratiev's message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2003 12:30:17 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i586-suse-linux) References: <12KJ6-4F2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <12XQc-7Vs-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <12Z5u-1tG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Vladimir Kondratiev writes: >> > I thought this way also. But I found that it is not. You may know > several chipsets, > and do per-chipset stuff, but there is no generic procedure. At least > authors of PCI-E > don't know (it is nice to have access to the authors ;-) ). This sounds like a serious design flaw in PCI-Express. Can you ask them to address this before it is too late? -Andi