From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 21:24:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 21:24:08 -0400 Received: from h08004614c48b.ne.mediaone.net ([66.31.21.118]:56836 "EHLO noop.") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 21:23:50 -0400 To: Dave Morgan Cc: acpi@phobos.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: AGP support locks X - was Re: sony vaio, crude workaround In-Reply-To: <20010817124100.12469.qmail@web20304.mail.yahoo.com> From: Nick Papadonis Organization: None X-Face: 01-z%.O)i7LB;Cnxv)caA5j@>3jYX:)*O6:@F>it.>stK5,i^jk0epU\$*cQ9 !)Oqf[@SOzys\7Ym}:2KWpM=8OCC` Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 17 Aug 2001 21:20:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20010817124100.12469.qmail@web20304.mail.yahoo.com> (Dave Morgan's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2001 05:41:00 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This solved the problem. Apparently AGP has to be built as a module in kernels v2.4.8 or X will lock up? Anyone else experience this? > I'm not sure that this is the problem you are having, > but I had a problem with X when I was playing with the > ACPI stuff and recompiling the kernel on my vaio. Try > setting CONFIG_AGP=m (i.e. make AGP support a module, > as opposed to being compiled in-kernel.) if it isn't. > Once I did that, X started up just fine. Good luck. > > Dave Dave Morgan writes: > >> I tried this and it doesn't disable the console. > The /proc/acpi > >> represents the correct power status. When I tried > to > >> start up X the following error occurs: > >> > >> I810 Dma Initialization Failed > >> XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) > >on X server > >":0.0" > >> after 0 requests (0 known processed) with 0 > >events remaining. > >> > >> So the work around must break something else? > > >Follup: > > >This isn't because of the ACPI code. It's something > >that happens in > >my 2.4.8 kernel wo ACPI compiled in. This behavior > is >not shown with > >the 2.2.16 kernel. >