From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:19:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:19:45 -0500 Received: from austin.jhcloos.com ([206.224.83.202]:35594 "HELO austin.jhcloos.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 18:19:38 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN In-Reply-To: <14960.29127.172573.22453@pizda.ninka.net> <200101251905.f0PJ5ZG216578@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <14960.31423.938042.486045@pizda.ninka.net> <20010125115214.D9992@draco.foogod.com> From: "James H. Cloos Jr." In-Reply-To: <20010125115214.D9992@draco.foogod.com> Date: 25 Jan 2001 17:19:37 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "alex" == alex writes: alex> I think the point of a test address is that this could alex> conceivably affect more providers than just Hotmail, and it alex> would be useful for people to be able to check to make sure alex> their own provider isn't also ECN brain damaged ... I have to agree with this. Are there any well know sites using ECN we can test against? Doesn't have to be a mail server, of course. Maybe a web server with auth lookups turned on? or an ftp server supporting only non-passive xfers. An open squid. Several possibilities exist for the general case. (Although for some who want to test a mail autoresponder may be the only useable option....) -JimC -- James H. Cloos, Jr. 1024D/ED7DAEA6 E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/