From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: select for UNIX sockets?
Date: 10 Jun 2003 16:21:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3k7buxbbr.fsf@defiant.pm.waw.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EE5DE7E.4090800@techsource.com>
Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com> writes:
> If you were to use blocking writes, and you sent too much data, then
> you would block. If you were to use non-blocking writes, then the
> socket would take as much data as it could, then return from write()
> with an indication of how much data actually got sent. Then you call
> select() again so as to wait for your next opportunity to send some
> more of your data.
This is all true in general but in this particular case of unix datagram
sockets select (poll) is just buggy.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Network Administrator
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-10 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-06 12:20 select for UNIX sockets? MarKol
2003-06-07 0:14 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-08 0:04 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-09 3:11 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-09 17:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-09 17:55 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-09 22:24 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-10 13:34 ` Timothy Miller
2003-06-10 13:52 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-10 14:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2003-06-10 19:04 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-11 21:55 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-11 22:50 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-11 12:51 ` Edgar Toernig
2003-06-10 21:40 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-11 22:04 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-09 23:45 ` James Stevenson
2003-06-08 4:15 ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-09 3:05 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-09 16:46 ` MarKol
2003-06-09 17:05 ` David Schwartz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-04 12:19 Petr Vandrovec
2003-06-06 0:28 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-06-06 0:38 ` Petr Vandrovec
2003-06-03 0:08 Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-03 14:51 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-04 23:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-05 13:17 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-06-04 11:55 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-06-04 12:42 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3k7buxbbr.fsf@defiant.pm.waw.pl \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=davids@webmaster.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox