From: Joachim Breuer <jmbreuer@gmx.net>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Dan Maas <dmaas@dcine.com>, Jeremy Jackson <jerj@coplanar.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unwanted disk access by the kernel?
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:11:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3n0x8pmxj.fsf@venus.fo.et.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005401c1cc51$ab6c3fe0$1a02a8c0@allyourbase> <E16lwyE-0004N7-00@the-village.bc.nu> <20020316013027.GD363@matchmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020316013027.GD363@matchmail.com> (Mike Fedyk's message of "Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:30:27 -0800")
Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:02:30PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > By the way, if I enable 'APM makes CPU idle calls when idle,' I get a
>> > constant stream of 'apm_do_idle failed (3)' messages. APM also doesn't seem
>> > to be able to power the machine down... This is a Dell Inspiron 7500...
>> > Maybe I should try ACPI?
>>
>> ACPI is a bit experimental right now but if you want some fun then obviously
>> the more people who break the ACPI code the better.
>
> For my uses (basically just power down) ACPI has worked on 99% of my
> machines (mix of pii & piii).
Same here (I'd rather say 100%). Temperature reading seems to work in
all machines as well. That's just machines I'm actually touching,
though; so they tend not to be supermarket bargains.
On a halfway related note APM fails to power down my Siemens PCD-5ND
(Pentium 75 laptop) (which obviously doesn't support ACPI).
The interesting thing is that the kernel shipped with RH 7.2 does
power down the machine, just the one from kernel.org doesn't
(2.4.16). (APM compiled as a module).
Is there some patch I could try?
So long,
Joe
--
"I use emacs, which might be thought of as a thermonuclear
word processor."
-- Neal Stephenson, "In the beginning... was the command line"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-16 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-15 6:36 unwanted disk access by the kernel? Dan Maas
2002-03-15 7:00 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-15 9:20 ` Jeremy Jackson
2002-03-15 18:46 ` Dan Maas
2002-03-15 19:02 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-16 1:30 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-03-16 15:11 ` Joachim Breuer [this message]
2002-03-15 14:35 ` Alan Cox
2002-03-19 15:06 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3n0x8pmxj.fsf@venus.fo.et.local \
--to=jmbreuer@gmx.net \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dmaas@dcine.com \
--cc=jerj@coplanar.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox