From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752514AbZH0Mkt (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:40:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751664AbZH0Mks (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:40:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23882 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750833AbZH0Mks (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:40:48 -0400 From: Andreas Schwab To: heitkamp@ameritech.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: popen2 popen call References: X-Yow: ...Just enough time to do my LIBERACE impression... Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 14:40:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: (F. Heitkamp's message of "Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:12:31 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "F. Heitkamp" writes: > When the popen call is made in sshd/session.c I get a error from > strerror of "Function not Implemented". Which function exactly returns this error? > I googled a bit and found that there is sometimes an problem between > the way the kernel and glibc are compiled that causes glibc not to > find the popen2 call in the kernel. There is no such thing as a popen2 syscall. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different."