public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:50:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3skyeby64.fsf@maximus.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47E91256.3010000@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Tue\, 25 Mar 2008 10\:55\:18 -0400")

Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:

> 	I guess it should go into 2.6.25, not sure about "stable"
> 	series. I will appreciate any feedback, review and/or test
> 	results.

Right. Perhaps I should care a bit more about the stable series...

> At the time of the posting 2.6.25-rc6 had already been released, which
> seems like an inappropriate time for all that new code, which has been
> given so little exposure to real world testing.

Sure.

> Certainly your original message said PPP panics, but without even
> minimal testing how do we know that your new code doesn't have equally
> problematic issues?

Well, there was something like "minimal testing", and it doesn't panic
100% like the old code does. But the probability that it won't work
correctly is quite high.

IOW: the new version is certainly better than the old one, though it's
not the normal quality (in terms of testing) I'd like to see.

> So quite honestly a CONFIG_BROKEN patch might indeed be more
> appropriate since generic HDLC works with Frame Relay at least...

Actually Frame Relay and other protocols are not affected, the PPP
patch doesn't change them a bit, it's a different module. The new code
only affect PPP protocol.

I'm fine with the Kconfig patch, actually I'm not sure what is better
at this time - a known broken module marked as such or a new module
with some small chances that it will crash the machine and with much
bigger chances that it won't work with a certain PPP implementation on
the other end.

Something like that?
Untested :-)

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>

--- a/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
@@ -150,9 +150,13 @@ config HDLC_FR
 
 config HDLC_PPP
 	tristate "Synchronous Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) support"
-	depends on HDLC
+	depends on HDLC && BROKEN
 	help
 	  Generic HDLC driver supporting PPP over WAN connections.
+	  This module is currently broken and will cause a kernel panic
+	  when a device configured in PPP mode is activated.
+
+	  It will be replaced by new PPP implementation in Linux 2.6.26.
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-25 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-12 18:21 WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 18:30 ` [PATCH] " Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 18:52   ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-12 19:25     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 19:38   ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-12 20:10     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 22:12       ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-14 14:16       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-14 14:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-25 14:39   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-25 14:55     ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-25 15:50       ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2008-03-26 23:05       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-25 23:14     ` David Miller
2008-03-26 15:01       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-11 21:35     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-12  5:14       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-12  8:10         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-12  8:50           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-12 19:25             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-12 10:59           ` Alan Cox
2008-04-12 20:19             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-14 19:16               ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-04-14 21:09                 ` David Miller
2008-04-18 15:58               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-18 22:32                 ` David Miller
2008-04-21 15:30                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-21 19:31                     ` James Chapman
2008-04-22 19:06                       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-22 21:46                         ` Paul Fulghum
2008-04-22 20:50                           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 22:05                             ` David Miller
2008-04-23 17:02                               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-23 22:49                                 ` David Miller
2008-04-24  0:48                                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24  1:08                                     ` David Miller
2008-04-24 13:12                                       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 13:30                                         ` David Miller
2008-04-24 13:39                                           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 13:55                                             ` David Miller
2008-04-24 20:46                                               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 20:44                                                 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-25 11:10                                                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-12 10:32                                                   ` David Miller
2008-05-14 12:45                                                     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-19 17:00                                                       ` [PATCH] WAN: protect HDLC proto list while insmod/rmmod Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-19 21:06                                                         ` David Miller
2008-05-22 10:27                                                         ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-14 16:17                                                     ` [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 20:50                                                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-22 22:23                             ` James Chapman
2008-04-22 22:51                               ` David Miller
2008-04-22 22:02                           ` David Miller
2008-04-22 23:52                             ` Paul Fulghum
2008-04-12  9:12   ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3skyeby64.fsf@maximus.localdomain \
    --to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox