From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:50:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3skyeby64.fsf@maximus.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47E91256.3010000@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Tue\, 25 Mar 2008 10\:55\:18 -0400")
Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:
> I guess it should go into 2.6.25, not sure about "stable"
> series. I will appreciate any feedback, review and/or test
> results.
Right. Perhaps I should care a bit more about the stable series...
> At the time of the posting 2.6.25-rc6 had already been released, which
> seems like an inappropriate time for all that new code, which has been
> given so little exposure to real world testing.
Sure.
> Certainly your original message said PPP panics, but without even
> minimal testing how do we know that your new code doesn't have equally
> problematic issues?
Well, there was something like "minimal testing", and it doesn't panic
100% like the old code does. But the probability that it won't work
correctly is quite high.
IOW: the new version is certainly better than the old one, though it's
not the normal quality (in terms of testing) I'd like to see.
> So quite honestly a CONFIG_BROKEN patch might indeed be more
> appropriate since generic HDLC works with Frame Relay at least...
Actually Frame Relay and other protocols are not affected, the PPP
patch doesn't change them a bit, it's a different module. The new code
only affect PPP protocol.
I'm fine with the Kconfig patch, actually I'm not sure what is better
at this time - a known broken module marked as such or a new module
with some small chances that it will crash the machine and with much
bigger chances that it won't work with a certain PPP implementation on
the other end.
Something like that?
Untested :-)
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
--- a/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/Kconfig
@@ -150,9 +150,13 @@ config HDLC_FR
config HDLC_PPP
tristate "Synchronous Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) support"
- depends on HDLC
+ depends on HDLC && BROKEN
help
Generic HDLC driver supporting PPP over WAN connections.
+ This module is currently broken and will cause a kernel panic
+ when a device configured in PPP mode is activated.
+
+ It will be replaced by new PPP implementation in Linux 2.6.26.
If unsure, say N.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 18:21 WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 18:30 ` [PATCH] " Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 18:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-12 19:25 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 19:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-12 20:10 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-12 22:12 ` Jan Engelhardt
2008-03-14 14:16 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-14 14:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-25 14:39 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-25 14:55 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-25 15:50 ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]
2008-03-26 23:05 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-03-25 23:14 ` David Miller
2008-03-26 15:01 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-11 21:35 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-12 5:14 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-12 8:10 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-12 8:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-12 19:25 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-12 10:59 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-12 20:19 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-14 19:16 ` Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
2008-04-14 21:09 ` David Miller
2008-04-18 15:58 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-18 22:32 ` David Miller
2008-04-21 15:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-21 19:31 ` James Chapman
2008-04-22 19:06 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-22 21:46 ` Paul Fulghum
2008-04-22 20:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-04-22 22:05 ` David Miller
2008-04-23 17:02 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-23 22:49 ` David Miller
2008-04-24 0:48 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 1:08 ` David Miller
2008-04-24 13:12 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 13:30 ` David Miller
2008-04-24 13:39 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 13:55 ` David Miller
2008-04-24 20:46 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 20:44 ` Alan Cox
2008-04-25 11:10 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-12 10:32 ` David Miller
2008-05-14 12:45 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-19 17:00 ` [PATCH] WAN: protect HDLC proto list while insmod/rmmod Krzysztof Halasa
2008-05-19 21:06 ` David Miller
2008-05-22 10:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-14 16:17 ` [PATCH v2] Re: WAN: new PPP code for generic HDLC Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-24 20:50 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2008-04-22 22:23 ` James Chapman
2008-04-22 22:51 ` David Miller
2008-04-22 22:02 ` David Miller
2008-04-22 23:52 ` Paul Fulghum
2008-04-12 9:12 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3skyeby64.fsf@maximus.localdomain \
--to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox