From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 20:17:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 20:17:37 -0500 Received: from austin.jhcloos.com ([206.224.83.202]:18952 "HELO austin.jhcloos.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 20:17:21 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse , Andre Hedrick , Hakan Lennestal Subject: Re: Chipsets, DVD-RAM, and timeouts.... In-Reply-To: <20010102191600.511DD4185@tuttifrutti.cdt.luth.se> From: "James H. Cloos Jr." In-Reply-To: Hakan Lennestal's message of "Tue, 02 Jan 2001 20:15:55 +0100" Date: 02 Jan 2001 18:46:55 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Hakan" == Hakan Lennestal writes: Hakan> Yes, the problem is the hpt366 (or the sw), not the IBM drives. Hakan> The IBM drives seem to work well with udma3 on the hpt but not Hakan> with udma4 or higher. Is this specific to the 366? My DTLAs on a 370 are working like a charm at udma5. I haven't run bonnie or DiskPerf on them, but hdparm shows values that look right (~36MB/s for -t and ~136MB/s for -T). Box is currently on 2.2.18 + ide-2.2.18-1209, but was also run on a 2.4.0-test1n (11 IIRC) for a while w/ similar results. -JimC -- James H. Cloos, Jr. 1024D/ED7DAEA6 E9E9 F828 61A4 6EA9 0F2B 63E7 997A 9F17 ED7D AEA6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/