From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262767AbTLWVnn (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:43:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262790AbTLWVnh (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:43:37 -0500 Received: from zero.aec.at ([193.170.194.10]:62980 "EHLO zero.aec.at") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262767AbTLWVk5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2003 16:40:57 -0500 To: Yaroslav Klyukin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0 and x86_64 From: Andi Kleen Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:40:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <162gF-8hY-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (Yaroslav Klyukin's message of "Tue, 23 Dec 2003 22:30:25 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i586-suse-linux) References: <162gF-8hY-27@gated-at.bofh.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yaroslav Klyukin writes: > Did anybody have any experience with %subj%? > I am curious about stability. There are several nasty bugs in 2.6.0/x86-64. Only use it with the x86-64 patchkit (ftp://ftp.x86-64.org/pub/linux/v2.6/*) -Andi