Re: [PATCHSET] Mobile IPv6 for 2.5.43

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2002-11-01T03:23:46Z

In article <20021031104146.GA18786@morphine.tml.hut.fi> (at Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:41:46 +0200), Antti Tuominen <ajtuomin@morphine.tml.hut.fi> says:

> > (4) Processing Mobility Header
> > How about using ip6_txoptions and hdrproc_lst?
> > Because Mobility header is an extension header, we think it is
> > reasonable way to handle it in ipv6_parse_exthdrs().
>
> No. We did this back in Draft 15, when all the mobility stuff was
> destination options. Mobility Header is not an extension header, but
> rather a final protocol. Only Home Address Option is an extension
> header and is handled in ipv6/exthdrs.c. What is the problem with
> this?

This is not so strong request here at this moment.

--yoshfuji