* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
[not found] <18PmG-40b-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2004-01-01 22:01 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-03 2:09 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2004-01-01 22:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srihari Vijayaraghavan; +Cc: linux-kernel
Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@bigpond.com> writes:
> While "make bzImage", it showed these error messages:
> CC arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.o
I already submitted a patch to fix that and Linus merged it.
Use current -bk*
The MSI code is unfortunately quite broken and will need more
work to really work on anything except IA32.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
2004-01-01 22:01 ` 2.6.1-rc1 compile error Andi Kleen
@ 2004-01-03 2:09 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2004-01-03 2:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-03 4:22 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan @ 2004-01-03 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hello Andi,
On Friday 02 January 2004 09:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@bigpond.com> writes:
> > While "make bzImage", it showed these error messages:
> > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.o
>
> I already submitted a patch to fix that and Linus merged it.
> Use current -bk*
Unfortunately the current -bk* would not apply cleanly. For eg,
patch-2.6.1-rc1-bk3 does not apply to 2.6.1-rc1. Maybe when 2.6.1-rc2 is out
I shall try it out at that time.
(BTW I have tried 2.6.1-rc1-x8664-1, and all is fine with that.)
> The MSI code is unfortunately quite broken and will need more
> work to really work on anything except IA32.
>
> -Andi
Thanks
Hari
harisri@bigpond.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
2004-01-03 2:09 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
@ 2004-01-03 2:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-03 4:22 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2004-01-03 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srihari Vijayaraghavan; +Cc: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 01:09:10PM +1100, Srihari Vijayaraghavan wrote:
> Hello Andi,
>
> On Friday 02 January 2004 09:01, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Srihari Vijayaraghavan <harisri@bigpond.com> writes:
> > > While "make bzImage", it showed these error messages:
> > > CC arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.o
> >
> > I already submitted a patch to fix that and Linus merged it.
> > Use current -bk*
>
> Unfortunately the current -bk* would not apply cleanly. For eg,
> patch-2.6.1-rc1-bk3 does not apply to 2.6.1-rc1. Maybe when 2.6.1-rc2 is out
> I shall try it out at that time.
It applied fine for me. Maybe your trees are corrupted.
> (BTW I have tried 2.6.1-rc1-x8664-1, and all is fine with that.)
There's one bug in there that breaks it on some boxes.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
2004-01-03 2:09 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2004-01-03 2:51 ` Andi Kleen
@ 2004-01-03 4:22 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan @ 2004-01-03 4:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel
Thanks Andi. With a clean 2.6.1-rc1 tree and -bk3 patch all is well.
Hari
harisri@bigpond.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
@ 2003-12-31 14:09 Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2004-01-01 9:26 ` Juergen Hasch
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Srihari Vijayaraghavan @ 2003-12-31 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
While "make bzImage", it showed these error messages:
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.o
arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c:1215: error: redefinition of
`disable_edge_ioapic_irq'
include/asm/io_apic.h:178: error: `disable_edge_ioapic_irq' previously defined
here
arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c:1259: error: redefinition of
`end_edge_ioapic_irq'
include/asm/io_apic.h:180: error: `end_edge_ioapic_irq' previously defined
here
arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c:1346: error: redefinition of
`mask_and_ack_level_ioapic_irq'
include/asm/io_apic.h:179: error: `mask_and_ack_level_ioapic_irq' previously
defined here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/x86_64/kernel] Error 2
I applied this patch (I do not know, it could be wrong):
--- 2.6.1-rc1/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c.orig 2004-01-01 00:56:40.534040872
+1100
+++ 2.6.1-rc1/arch/x86_64/kernel/io_apic.c 2004-01-01 00:57:46.491013888
+1100
@@ -1212,7 +1212,6 @@
*/
#define enable_edge_ioapic_irq unmask_IO_APIC_irq
-static void disable_edge_ioapic_irq (unsigned int irq) { /* nothing */ }
/*
* Starting up a edge-triggered IO-APIC interrupt is
@@ -1256,7 +1255,6 @@
ack_APIC_irq();
}
-static void end_edge_ioapic_irq (unsigned int i) { /* nothing */ }
/*
@@ -1343,7 +1341,6 @@
}
}
-static void mask_and_ack_level_ioapic_irq (unsigned int irq) { /* nothing */
}
static void set_ioapic_affinity (unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
{
Then it compiled the io_apic.c and progressed (maybe a lot). But it failed and
showed this error message:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
arch/i386/pci/built-in.o(.text+0xc6e): In function `pcibios_lookup_irq':
: undefined reference to `can_request_irq'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
Please feel free to send me patches, I am happy to test and report. BTW I see
the same behaviour with 2.6.1-rc1-mm1 too.
Thanks
Hari
harisri@bigpond.com
PS: I am hoping for a good 2.6.1 (out of the box) for x86-64
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
2003-12-31 14:09 Srihari Vijayaraghavan
@ 2004-01-01 9:26 ` Juergen Hasch
2004-01-01 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Hasch @ 2004-01-01 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Srihari Vijayaraghavan, linux-kernel; +Cc: Linus Torvalds
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]
Am Mittwoch, 31. Dezember 2003 15:09 schrieb Srihari Vijayaraghavan:
>
>
> Then it compiled the io_apic.c and progressed (maybe a lot). But it failed
> and showed this error message:
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
>
> arch/i386/pci/built-in.o(.text+0xc6e): In function `pcibios_lookup_irq':
> : undefined reference to `can_request_irq'
>
> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
This is obviously due to can_request_irq is found in arch/i386/kernel/irq.c
and the x86_64 build just includes some stuff from arch/i386/pci/irq.c where
can_request_irq is used too.
Linus introduced this function a few weeks ago. I used the patch below to move
the function from kernel/irq.c to pci/irq.c, but he will probably fix it
himself soon.
Btw. there are a lot of other fixes for the x86_64 build from Andi Kleen which
you should apply too. However, they don't apply cleanly anymore.
...Juergen
[-- Attachment #2: can_request_irq.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1075 bytes --]
--- arch/i386/kernel/irq.c.orig 2004-01-01 10:06:00.000000000 +0100
+++ arch/i386/kernel/irq.c 2003-12-31 13:13:58.000000000 +0100
@@ -511,19 +511,6 @@
return 1;
}
-int can_request_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned long irqflags)
-{
- struct irqaction *action;
-
- if (irq >= NR_IRQS)
- return 0;
- action = irq_desc[irq].action;
- if (action) {
- if (irqflags & action->flags & SA_SHIRQ)
- action = NULL;
- }
- return !action;
-}
/**
* request_irq - allocate an interrupt line
--- arch/i386/pci/irq.c.orig 2004-01-01 10:06:42.000000000 +0100
+++ arch/i386/pci/irq.c 2003-12-31 13:24:35.000000000 +0100
@@ -939,6 +939,20 @@
pirq_penalty[irq] += 100;
}
+int can_request_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned long irqflags)
+{
+ struct irqaction *action;
+
+ if (irq >= NR_IRQS)
+ return 0;
+ action = irq_desc[irq].action;
+ if (action) {
+ if (irqflags & action->flags & SA_SHIRQ)
+ action = NULL;
+ }
+ return !action;
+}
+
int pirq_enable_irq(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
u8 pin;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: 2.6.1-rc1 compile error
2004-01-01 9:26 ` Juergen Hasch
@ 2004-01-01 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2004-01-01 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juergen Hasch; +Cc: Srihari Vijayaraghavan, linux-kernel
On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Juergen Hasch wrote:
>
> Linus introduced this function a few weeks ago. I used the patch below to move
> the function from kernel/irq.c to pci/irq.c, but he will probably fix it
> himself soon.
I'd much rather have x86-64 have their own version. I would prefer to keep
the irq knowledge in the irq layer. Eventually that irq layer will get
unified, but for now I do _not_ want some random PCI file to know about
irq handler internal data structures.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-03 4:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <18PmG-40b-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-01-01 22:01 ` 2.6.1-rc1 compile error Andi Kleen
2004-01-03 2:09 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2004-01-03 2:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-01-03 4:22 ` Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2003-12-31 14:09 Srihari Vijayaraghavan
2004-01-01 9:26 ` Juergen Hasch
2004-01-01 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox