Re: select for UNIX sockets?

[Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>]

"David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com> writes:

> 	It really doesn't matter. UDP applications have to control the transmit
> pacing at application level. There is absolutely no way for the kernel to
> know whether the path to the recipient is congested or not.

Because what? The kernel knows everything it has to know - i.e. complete
state of socket queue in question.

But if select() on sockets is illegal, should we make it return -Esth
instead of success. Certainly, we should get rid of invalid kernel code,
right?

> 	The kernel can't tell you when to send because that depends upon
> factors
> that are remote.

Such as?

> 	Yes, it would be nice of the kernel helped more. But the application
> has to
> deal with remote packet loss as well.

Could you please show me a place in the kernel which could cause such
a loss on local datagram sockets?
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
Network Administrator