From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC7DF221729; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:03:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754481783; cv=none; b=hUlE5cBz//zRb5zq2ZA+cvNkI1ftKc5kI6F7VaSYLW5qd/IeIQ4ThplhX7ymToCzSGf5xkgBpSFl4eTJYcCQOT2rcQnWjb1okygHujiAs+Q7QW8vlygbgkQIfEHoRRyXulQJ+N6C6JFfnXNNYveJHdenlGT+6FLF0cu8K7RwxEA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754481783; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iM3DL6rk0RbOHKY0NOC2WS44N14rliZCsKY1vAOE0s4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tqdNiIjTyFgLPwAefJRTjfispK4zewykaRn8Bj3BXfdvPbNngb9naS3jKZ0qsUvD0zC1oDIKq6VsTj3j3spp+WPAr3QmBYQVft6nULAnrIseJGscMvSQIeyr+JCgejC3yFJ0nTPXoky5aiNADN0FsNXmsAwrDBFs1g45+q3tPV4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Jjiq6aMR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Jjiq6aMR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F95DC4CEEB; Wed, 6 Aug 2025 12:02:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1754481783; bh=iM3DL6rk0RbOHKY0NOC2WS44N14rliZCsKY1vAOE0s4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Jjiq6aMRhbWCv5v74m8F3r/WETA/ORQJKafiqRDXRe1OAI+ZWJJuCD1Rb6RuQ930+ cxGf4XAVSsFnHxzsV5imiaoQi0U6QxnVqa8b8jhLJGQVPqjYAJT4WtOESQLnTEBLcr PdrWB5UTHuhRc/Pnc1xgTVONPRQamGcj5PEpEu4aaFvYE69JKzAXlBMhCIo9lhfz44 kEl96fvPjQh4UQOa0ISpr/HxTvDWPp2GXE9WRbQIt7uQJq4/rQk83yihh/4AsBrZd6 q/rJ9lbo1yIC2+m/EGCJJXcKVBbUNpsA8xDbuSon0D+0WkBHxTLxmAIQsrl9vAYYOR Pcqs7riARcj7w== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Pasha Tatashin Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Steven Rostedt , Jason Gunthorpe , Thomas Gleixner , jasonmiu@google.com, graf@amazon.com, changyuanl@google.com, rppt@kernel.org, dmatlack@google.com, rientjes@google.com, corbet@lwn.net, rdunlap@infradead.org, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, kanie@linux.alibaba.com, ojeda@kernel.org, aliceryhl@google.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tj@kernel.org, yoann.congal@smile.fr, mmaurer@google.com, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, chenridong@huawei.com, axboe@kernel.dk, mark.rutland@arm.com, jannh@google.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com, joel.granados@kernel.org, anna.schumaker@oracle.com, song@kernel.org, zhangguopeng@kylinos.cn, linux@weissschuh.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, rafael@kernel.org, dakr@kernel.org, bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org, cw00.choi@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com, yesanishhere@gmail.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com, aleksander.lobakin@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, leon@kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de, bhelgaas@google.com, wagi@kernel.org, djeffery@redhat.com, stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com, lennart@poettering.net, brauner@kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com, ajayachandra@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com, witu@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] libluo: introduce luoctl In-Reply-To: References: <20250723144649.1696299-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20250723144649.1696299-32-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> <20250729161450.GM36037@nvidia.com> <877bzqkc38.ffs@tglx> <20250729222157.GT36037@nvidia.com> <20250729183548.49d6c2dc@gandalf.local.home> Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 14:02:52 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Hi Pasha, On Tue, Aug 05 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote: >> To add some context: one of the reasons to include it in the series as >> an RFC at the end was to showcase the userspace side of the API and have >> a way for people to see how it can be used. Seeing an API in action >> provides useful context for reviewing patches. >> >> I think Pasha forgot to add the RFC tags when he created v2, since it is >> only meant to be RFC right now and not proper patches. > > Correct, I accidently removed RFC from memfd patches in the version. I > will include memfd preservation as RFCv1 in v3 submission. I didn't mean this for the memfd patches, only for libluo. I think the memfd patches are in decent shape. They aren't pristine, but I do think they are good enough to land and be improved iteratively. If you think otherwise, then what do you reckon needs to be done to make them _not_ RFC? -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav