From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7385724A046 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 10:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762337176; cv=none; b=X3akPRNaufpaYOmb+/jXMryZAYirO3XJucbLq1TK6BF98oarPMrjmTTPj1go3yTJU02hacha2zW2+MTbEAgwQnri9W37lIn/SAi9N7W0azgyOQ9zP3vBAO+0/43n8/lCSiZ5d5ae2TkJGZxAyNUDoczm7GgVg9cKK08G7Eq0f38= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762337176; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7xelL80uD+mmTJR2hN24e9Ymu3C2gxHRvhahEaLbF7Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ieY7CaCDI9lCps6pe625PbqPlIRVihJgZpzjfvLCby4aaIX5K5Jmay92HX2vSgAA+U8JHkG0mXr4iFzYwmSus1uxhOQxLnqsj7YZOWs1/PBFyK5D0Y3+f9qluA5VmO9i09HCVRIkqWK5C0Z4BCWp6m9g1eBxlInxJ2hT+ak1kIw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XEEheCSj; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XEEheCSj" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F501C116D0; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 10:06:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1762337176; bh=7xelL80uD+mmTJR2hN24e9Ymu3C2gxHRvhahEaLbF7Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=XEEheCSjZlHYcaoorplt0rQp5cepQJdG9XPrkjpeRyZZNwsZTULh6DAKX/St3FlgR 05qjxYR5hoyxzpKI0tkyeXyoPLZOrMLelfjfvga4J+Wqzgw9+cKAso7+9avEAGSqEo KwP5hf+BMCbGBeTb8892UAId7TL283+yLGI68VNqK/1GeUG4WGOWlqf9LDaY04j6sM CvUJKAjPFgu0qIvUzjbO/q0itD0EEx29Z/BxgZED0mPeUpbmjzPQFhZYsEphXtB1if qoWBeQ6ISiFlZQMOvlya8ylHlu4VKKSo1zn5sT4Q6NX2PB4OAbv9nx4dPoCIIqvRrU Ie9jRbkH4fySg== From: Pratyush Yadav To: Andrew Morton Cc: Pratyush Yadav , Baoquan He , Alexander Graf , Mike Rapoport , Pasha Tatashin , kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kho: misc fixes In-Reply-To: <20251103172321.689294e48c2fae795e114ce6@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Mon, 3 Nov 2025 17:23:21 -0800") References: <20251103180235.71409-1-pratyush@kernel.org> <20251103162020.ac696dbc695f9341e7a267f7@linux-foundation.org> <20251103172321.689294e48c2fae795e114ce6@linux-foundation.org> Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:06:13 +0100 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Nov 03 2025, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:20:20 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 19:02:30 +0100 Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> >> > This series has a couple of misc fixes for KHO I discovered during code >> > review and testing. >> > >> > The series is based on top of [0] which has another fix for the function >> > touched by patch 1. I spotted these two after sending the patch. If that >> > one needs a reroll, I can combine the three into a series. >> > >> >> Things appear to be misordered here. >> >> [1/2] "kho: fix unpreservation of higher-order vmalloc preservations" >> fixes a667300bd53f2, so it's wanted in 6.18-rcX >> >> [2/2] "kho: warn and exit when unpreserved page wasn't preserved" >> fixes fc33e4b44b271, so it's wanted in 6.16+ >> >> So can we please have [2/2] as a standalone fix against latest -linus, >> with a cc:stable? >> >> And then [1/2] as a standalone fix against latest -linus without a >> cc:stable. >> > > OK, I think I figured it out. > > In mm-hotfixes-unstable I have > > kho-fix-out-of-bounds-access-of-vmalloc-chunk.patch > kho-fix-unpreservation-of-higher-order-vmalloc-preservations.patch > kho-warn-and-exit-when-unpreserved-page-wasnt-preserved.patch > > The first two are applicable to 6.18-rcX and the third is applicable to > 6.18-rcX, with a cc:stable for backporting. Right. Sorry for the confusion. I see that on mm-hotfixes-unstable you already updated the third patch with Cc: stable. Thanks. -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav