* Linux 6.16-rc1
@ 2025-06-08 21:17 Linus Torvalds
2025-06-11 1:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-06-11 5:55 ` linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 6.16-rc1) Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2025-06-08 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
So it's Sunday afternoon, and we all know what that means by now: the
merge window is closed, rc1 has been cut and pushed out, and we're all
supposed to start testing (and fixing) all the new code.
I think we had a fairly normal merge window, although I did get the
feeling that there were a few more "late straggler" pull requests than
usual. Not to a huge degree, but there was definitely an upward bump
at the end of the second week.
But on the whole, all the stats look pretty normal: about half the
diff is driver updates (all over, although as usual gpu and networking
account for a fairly large chunk of it).
On the non-driver front, it looks like basically one third arch
updates, one third documentation and tooling (perf tool and
selftests), and one third "the rest".
That last part is where all the core changes go: filesystems, core
kernel and MM, networking etc. Typically not huge changes, but often
some of the more important ones. Although maybe that "more important"
comment just shows my personal biases.
Anyway, mergelog below giving at least an approximate high-level feel
for what I've merged this time around. The full shortlog is as always
much too big. We had just under 13k non-merge commits, and closer to a
thousand merges. And 1783 unique author names...
Linus
---
Al Viro (4):
mount propagation fix
UFS updates
automount updates
mount fixes
Alex Williamson (1):
VFIO updates
Alexandre Belloni (2):
i3c updates
RTC updates
Alexei Starovoitov (2):
bpf updates
bpf fixes
Andreas Gruenbacher (2):
gfs2 updates
gfs2 fix
Andreas Hindborg (1):
configfs updates
Andrew Morton (5):
MM updates
non-MM updates
more MM updates
misc fixes
more MM updates
Anna Schumaker (1):
NFS clent updates
Ard Biesheuvel (1):
EFI updates
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (1):
perf tools updates
Arnd Bergmann (6):
SoC driver updates
ARM SoC updates
SoC defconfig updates
SoC devicetree updates
sophgo SoC devicetree updates
compiler version requirement update
Bartosz Golaszewski (1):
gpio updates
Bjorn Andersson (2):
remoteproc updates
rpmsg updates
Bjorn Helgaas (1):
pci updates
Borislav Petkov (5):
x86 resource control updates
EDAC updates
mtrr update
AMD SEV update
EDAC fix
Carlos Maiolino (1):
xfs updates
Casey Schaufler (1):
smack update
Christian Brauner (12):
vfs directory lookup updates
final writepage conversion
vfs mount api conversions
misc vfs updates
vfs freezing updates
vfs mount updates
pidfs updates
coredump updates
iomap updates
vfs selftests updates
vfs fixes
netfs updates
Chuck Lever (1):
nfsd updates
Corey Minyard (1):
IPMI updates
Damien Le Moal (1):
ata updates
Dan Williams (1):
trusted security manager (TSM) updates
Dave Airlie (2):
drm updates
drm fixes
Dave Hansen (1):
Intel software guard extension (SGX) updates
Dave Jiang (1):
Compute Express Link (CXL) updates
David Kleikamp (1):
jfs updates
David Sterba (2):
btrfs updates
btrfs fix
David Teigland (1):
dlm updates
Dmitry Torokhov (1):
input updates
Eric Biggers (2):
fscrypt update
CRC updates
Fan Wu (1):
IPE update
Gao Xiang (1):
erofs updates
Geert Uytterhoeven (1):
m68k updates
Greg KH (6):
driver core updates
LICENSES update
staging driver updates
char / misc / iio driver updates
tty/serial updates
USB / Thunderbolt updates
Greg Ungerer (1):
m68knommu updates
Guenter Roeck (1):
hwmon updates
Heiko Carstens (2):
s390 updates
more s390 updates
Helge Deller (2):
fbdev updates
parisc updates
Herbert Xu (3):
crypto updates
crypto fix
crypto fixes
Huacai Chen (1):
LoongArch updates
Ilpo Järvinen (1):
x86 platform drivers updates
Ilya Dryomov (1):
ceph updates
Ingo Molnar (9):
locking updates
objtool updates
scheduler updates
perf events updates
core x86 updates
x86 cleanups
x86 debug updates
x86 vdso updates
x86 build updates
Jaegeuk Kim (1):
f2fs updates
Jakub Kicinski (1):
networking fixes
James Bottomley (2):
SCSI updates
SCSI fixes
Jan Kara (2):
fsnotify updates
ext2 and isofs updates
Jarkko Sakkinen (1):
tpm updates
Jason Gunthorpe (1):
rdma updates
Jassi Brar (1):
mailbox updates
Jens Axboe (4):
block updates
io_uring updates
io_uring fixes
more block updates
Jiri Kosina (1):
HID updates
Joel Fernandes (1):
RCU updates
Joel Granados (1):
sysctl updates
Joerg Roedel (1):
iommu updates
Johannes Berg (1):
UML updates
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (1):
sh updates
Jonathan Corbet (1):
documentation updates
Juergen Gross (1):
xen updates
Kees Cook (3):
seccomp updates
hardening updates
hardening fixes
Kent Overstreet (2):
bcachefs updates
more bcachefs updates
Konstantin Komarov (1):
ntfs updates
Lee Jones (3):
MFD updates
LED updates
backlight updates
Len Brown (1):
turbostat updates
Linus Walleij (1):
pin control updates
Madhavan Srinivasan (1):
powerpc updates
Marek Szyprowski (1):
dma-mapping updates
Mark Brown (5):
regmap updates
regulator updates
spi updates
regulator fix
more spi updates
Masahiro Yamada (1):
Kbuild updates
Masami Hiramatsu (1):
bootconfig updates
Mauro Carvalho Chehab (1):
media updates
Max Filippov (1):
xtensa updates
Michael Tsirkin (1):
virtio updates
Michal Simek (1):
microblaze update
Miguel Ojeda (1):
Rust updates
Mike Marshall (1):
orangefs update
Miklos Szeredi (2):
fuse updates
overlayfs update
Mikulas Patocka (1):
device mapper updates
Mimi Zohar (1):
integrity updates
Miquel Raynal (1):
MTD updates
Namjae Jeon (1):
exfat updates
Palmer Dabbelt (1):
RISC-V updates
Paolo Abeni (1):
networking updates
Paolo Bonzini (2):
kvm updates
more kvm updates
Paul McKenney (2):
rate-limit updates
lkmm updates
Paul Moore (3):
lsm update
selinux updates
audit updates
Petr Pavlu (1):
module updates
Rafael Wysocki (6):
thermal control updates
ACPI updates
power management updates
more power management updates
ACPI fixes
power management fixes
Richard Weinberger (1):
JFFS2 and UBIFS fixes
Rob Herring (1):
devicetree updates
Russell King (1):
ARM fixes
Sebastian Reichel (1):
power supply and reset updates
Shuah Khan (2):
Kselftest updates
kunit updates
Simona Vetter (1):
more drm fixes
Stafford Horne (1):
OpenRISC updates
Stephen Boyd (1):
clk updates
Steve French (3):
smb client updates
smb server updates
more smb client updates
Steven Rostedt (5):
tracing tools updates
tracing updates
ring-buffer updates
tracing fixes
more tracing fixes
Takashi Iwai (2):
sound updates
sound fixes
Ted Ts'o (1):
ext4 updates
Tejun Heo (5):
workqueue updates
cgroup updates
sched_ext updates
cgroup fix
sched_ext fixes
Tetsuo Handa (1):
tomoyo update
Thomas Bogendoerfer (1):
MIPS updates
Thomas Gleixner (13):
core entry code updates
irq core updates
irq controller updates
irq cleanups
MSI updates
timer cleanups
clocksource updates
timer core updates
irq fix
x86 perf fix
timer fix
x86 fixes
timer cleanup
Thomas Weißschuh (1):
nolibc updates
Tzung-Bi Shih (1):
chrome-platform updates
Ulf Hansson (2):
pmdomain updates
MMC updates
Uwe Kleine-König (2):
pwm updates
pwm fixes
Vinod Koul (3):
soundwire updates
phy updates
dmaengine updates
Vlastimil Babka (1):
slab updates
Wei Liu (1):
hyperv updates
Will Deacon (2):
arm64 updates
arm64 fixes
Wim Van Sebroeck (1):
watchdog updates
Wolfram Sang (1):
i2c updates
Yury Norov (1):
bitmap updates
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-08 21:17 Linux 6.16-rc1 Linus Torvalds
@ 2025-06-11 1:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-06-21 5:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-11 5:55 ` linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 6.16-rc1) Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2025-06-11 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alexander Usyskin, Miquel Raynal
On Sun, Jun 08, 2025 at 02:17:49PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So it's Sunday afternoon, and we all know what that means by now: the
> merge window is closed, rc1 has been cut and pushed out, and we're all
> supposed to start testing (and fixing) all the new code.
>
Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 633 pass: 628 fail: 5
Failed tests:
arm:supermicro-x11spi-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:mtd32,0,6,1:net=nic:aspeed-bmc-supermicro-x11spi:sqf
arm:ast2600-evb:aspeed_g5_defconfig:mtd64,0,6,1:net=nic:aspeed-ast2600-evb:ext2
arm:fuji-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:mem1G:mtd128,0,8,1:net=nic:aspeed-bmc-facebook-fuji:f2fs
arm:g220a-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:mtd32,0,12,2:net=nic:aspeed-bmc-bytedance-g220a:sqf
arm:qcom-dc-scm-v1-bmc:aspeed_g5_defconfig:mtd64,0,12,2:net=nic:aspeed-bmc-qcom-dc-scm-v1:ext2
Unit test results:
pass: 592743 fail: 0
The test failures are all due to commit 0aa7b390fc40 ("mtd: core: always
create master device") which breaks mtd partitioning.
One side note: Various qemu machines configured to use Macronix flash chips
are no longer able to access the chips. This is primarily due to commit
947c86e481a0 ("mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Drop the redundant flash info
fields"). After that change, SFDP support for affected chips is mandatory,
and qemu does not or not correctly support that. This affects quanta-gsj,
kudo-bmc, ast2600-evb, and supermicro-x11spi-bmc machines (and possibly
others).
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 6.16-rc1)
2025-06-08 21:17 Linux 6.16-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2025-06-11 1:25 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2025-06-11 5:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-06-11 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2586 bytes --]
Hi all,
As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)
(No merge commits counted, next-20250526 was the first linux-next after
the merge window opened.)
Commits in v6.16-rc1 (relative to v6.15): 12899
Commits in next-20250526: 12253
Commits with the same SHA1: 11854
Commits with the same patch_id: 157 (1)
Commits with the same subject line: 8 (1)
(1) not counting those in the lines above.
So commits in -rc1 that were in next-20250526: 12019 93%
Some breakdown of the list of extra commits (relative to next-20250526)
in -rc1:
Top ten first word of commit summary:
79 net
65 drm
63 bcachefs
48 selftests
39 riscv
23 netfilter
22 perf
21 tools
21 asoc
19 can
Top ten authors:
62 kent.overstreet@linux.dev
19 biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com
17 rostedt@goodmis.org
15 fw@strlen.de
14 phil@nwl.cc
13 kees@kernel.org
12 rui.zhang@intel.com
12 cleger@rivosinc.com
11 masahiroy@kernel.org
11 jiawenwu@trustnetic.com
Top ten committers:
81 pabeni@redhat.com
63 kent.overstreet@linux.dev
50 kuba@kernel.org
47 palmer@dabbelt.com
41 alexander.deucher@amd.com
35 akpm@linux-foundation.org
31 pablo@netfilter.org
30 broonie@kernel.org
30 anna.schumaker@oracle.com
29 stfrench@microsoft.com
There are also 234 commits in next-20250526 that didn't make it into
v6.16-rc1.
Top ten first word of commit summary:
47 drm
43 arm
25 apparmor
17 arm64
13 dt-bindings
9 pci
8 i2c
7 soc
7 extcon
6 pm
Top ten authors:
18 john.johansen@canonical.com
16 himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com
12 linus.walleij@linaro.org
11 potin.lai.pt@gmail.com
8 ninad@linux.ibm.com
8 dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com
7 krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org
7 arnd@arndb.de
6 christian.bruel@foss.st.com
5 tomasz.lis@intel.com
Top ten committers:
29 alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com
28 andrew@codeconstruct.com.au
25 john.johansen@canonical.com
15 himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com
14 cw00.choi@samsung.com
12 florian.fainelli@broadcom.com
11 andi@smida.it
8 michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
5 srini@kernel.org
5 matthew.d.roper@intel.com
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-11 1:25 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2025-06-21 5:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-21 12:44 ` Pratyush Yadav
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2025-06-21 5:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alexander Usyskin, Miquel Raynal
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 18:25, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> The test failures are all due to commit 0aa7b390fc40 ("mtd: core: always
> create master device") which breaks mtd partitioning.
Ok, I just merged the pull request that reverted that one.
> One side note: Various qemu machines configured to use Macronix flash chips
> are no longer able to access the chips. This is primarily due to commit
> 947c86e481a0 ("mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Drop the redundant flash info
> fields"). After that change, SFDP support for affected chips is mandatory,
> and qemu does not or not correctly support that. This affects quanta-gsj,
> kudo-bmc, ast2600-evb, and supermicro-x11spi-bmc machines (and possibly
> others).
.. but this issue presumably remains, unless there's been some subtler
indirect fix that I didn't realize.
Miguel, that one came through you too. Comments? I do think that
running things in qemu is likely important for a lot of these things
that don't actually have a ton of hardware that is easily automated...
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-21 5:42 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2025-06-21 12:44 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-21 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Yadav @ 2025-06-21 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Guenter Roeck, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alexander Usyskin,
Miquel Raynal
Hi Linus,
On Fri, Jun 20 2025, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 at 18:25, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> The test failures are all due to commit 0aa7b390fc40 ("mtd: core: always
>> create master device") which breaks mtd partitioning.
>
> Ok, I just merged the pull request that reverted that one.
>
>> One side note: Various qemu machines configured to use Macronix flash chips
>> are no longer able to access the chips. This is primarily due to commit
>> 947c86e481a0 ("mtd: spi-nor: macronix: Drop the redundant flash info
>> fields"). After that change, SFDP support for affected chips is mandatory,
>> and qemu does not or not correctly support that. This affects quanta-gsj,
>> kudo-bmc, ast2600-evb, and supermicro-x11spi-bmc machines (and possibly
>> others).
>
> .. but this issue presumably remains, unless there's been some subtler
> indirect fix that I didn't realize.
>
> Miguel, that one came through you too. Comments? I do think that
> running things in qemu is likely important for a lot of these things
> that don't actually have a ton of hardware that is easily automated...
There isn't a fix AFAIK. From the thread [0], there seemed to be a
conclusion that it was a qemu problem and not directly a problem on the
driver side. So I dropped this down my list of priorities of things to
look into.
I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you
say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive
next week and have an answer by -rc4.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/8d4bd876-3571-46e5-857a-948e58b21c5b@roeck-us.net/
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-21 12:44 ` Pratyush Yadav
@ 2025-06-21 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-23 0:39 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2025-06-21 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Yadav
Cc: Guenter Roeck, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alexander Usyskin,
Miquel Raynal
On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 05:44, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you
> say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive
> next week and have an answer by -rc4.
Thanks. I'm not sure *how* important this is, but if it affects
Guenter's test coverage, I assume it affects others too.
But it's not entirely clear how much it *does* affect Guenter. He says
five failed tests, but those are all accounted for by the master
device thing.
Guenter, maybe you can clarify?
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-21 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2025-06-23 0:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-06-23 11:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2025-06-23 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Pratyush Yadav, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alexander Usyskin,
Miquel Raynal
On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 08:59:46AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 05:44, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you
> > say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive
> > next week and have an answer by -rc4.
>
> Thanks. I'm not sure *how* important this is, but if it affects
> Guenter's test coverage, I assume it affects others too.
>
> But it's not entirely clear how much it *does* affect Guenter. He says
> five failed tests, but those are all accounted for by the master
> device thing.
>
> Guenter, maybe you can clarify?
>
Sorry for the delay; I was travelling.
I modified qemu to make the flash type configurable, so it is not a problem
for me. However, anyone using upstream qemu will see the problem. My qemu patch
adding the option to configure the flash type was rejected, so those affected
will have to wait for a proper qemu fix.
I would suggest to not make any changes in the kernel: The qemu problems should be
fixed in qemu. I only brought this up to raise awareness that there is a qemu related
problem, not to ask for a change in the Linux kernel.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-23 0:39 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2025-06-23 11:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-23 13:47 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Pratyush Yadav @ 2025-06-23 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Pratyush Yadav, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Alexander Usyskin, Miquel Raynal
On Sun, Jun 22 2025, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 08:59:46AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 05:44, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you
>> > say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive
>> > next week and have an answer by -rc4.
>>
>> Thanks. I'm not sure *how* important this is, but if it affects
>> Guenter's test coverage, I assume it affects others too.
>>
>> But it's not entirely clear how much it *does* affect Guenter. He says
>> five failed tests, but those are all accounted for by the master
>> device thing.
>>
>> Guenter, maybe you can clarify?
>>
>
> Sorry for the delay; I was travelling.
>
> I modified qemu to make the flash type configurable, so it is not a problem
> for me. However, anyone using upstream qemu will see the problem. My qemu patch
> adding the option to configure the flash type was rejected, so those affected
> will have to wait for a proper qemu fix.
>
> I would suggest to not make any changes in the kernel: The qemu problems should be
> fixed in qemu. I only brought this up to raise awareness that there is a qemu related
> problem, not to ask for a change in the Linux kernel.
In case you missed it, see my reply in [0]. For me the flash works fine
with qemu v10.0.0. Which version do you have?
Anyway, I agree with you. Without further evidence, I think the kernel
side is fine and no fixes should be needed.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/mafs01prbvbjm.fsf@kernel.org/
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux 6.16-rc1
2025-06-23 11:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
@ 2025-06-23 13:47 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2025-06-23 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pratyush Yadav
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Alexander Usyskin,
Miquel Raynal
On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 01:17:27PM +0200, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22 2025, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 21, 2025 at 08:59:46AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 at 05:44, Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I don't have much idea of how people use qemu for testing, but since you
> >> > say this is important for testing workloads, I can take a deeper dive
> >> > next week and have an answer by -rc4.
> >>
> >> Thanks. I'm not sure *how* important this is, but if it affects
> >> Guenter's test coverage, I assume it affects others too.
> >>
> >> But it's not entirely clear how much it *does* affect Guenter. He says
> >> five failed tests, but those are all accounted for by the master
> >> device thing.
> >>
> >> Guenter, maybe you can clarify?
> >>
> >
> > Sorry for the delay; I was travelling.
> >
> > I modified qemu to make the flash type configurable, so it is not a problem
> > for me. However, anyone using upstream qemu will see the problem. My qemu patch
> > adding the option to configure the flash type was rejected, so those affected
> > will have to wait for a proper qemu fix.
> >
> > I would suggest to not make any changes in the kernel: The qemu problems should be
> > fixed in qemu. I only brought this up to raise awareness that there is a qemu related
> > problem, not to ask for a change in the Linux kernel.
>
> In case you missed it, see my reply in [0]. For me the flash works fine
> with qemu v10.0.0. Which version do you have?
>
10.0.2. I didn't try with other versions.
> Anyway, I agree with you. Without further evidence, I think the kernel
> side is fine and no fixes should be needed.
>
Correct.
Thanks,
Guenter
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/mafs01prbvbjm.fsf@kernel.org/
>
> --
> Regards,
> Pratyush Yadav
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-06-23 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-06-08 21:17 Linux 6.16-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2025-06-11 1:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-06-21 5:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-21 12:44 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-21 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-23 0:39 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-06-23 11:17 ` Pratyush Yadav
2025-06-23 13:47 ` Guenter Roeck
2025-06-11 5:55 ` linux-next: stats (Was: Linux 6.16-rc1) Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).